[Logophile]

Let me guess... the Family Research Council is widely regarded in scientific circles as a paragon of objective research, right? No agenda there, no sir....

If you were to visit the website of the Family Research Council, you would discover that they do indeed have an "agenda." But what of it? They make no secret of their point of view, and they do not pretend to be anything but an advocacy group.

The same cannot always be said of the "scientific circles" you mention. Too much of what passes for objective research in academia (especially in the social sciences) is little more than left-wing advocacy masquerading as science.

So, do you have any evidence to offer that the study by Daily et al. is inaccurate or flawed?