It'll be disproven. Sample size is too small to discount the possibility of the results being due to chance. Plus, we've been lied to by researchers promoting homosexuality before, no reason to assume these are telling the truth.
This is good, it proves that some at least is curable with gene therapy. Boy, I'm going to get out the popcorn for this one.
If that is even what the study says.
It may well be like finding the genes that control LEARNING. It may well be the learning genes have been detected.
Either way by arguing an "interaction" suggests these fools are grasping at straws since EVERY SINGLE OTHER STUDY has been disproven.
If this is true, will homosexuals oppose a genetic test? What happens when mothers abort fetuses with homosexual "genes", the same way down syndrome babies are aborted?
I believe this is more outcome oriented science to bolster the homo-marriage efforts.
Bingo!
Speaking of darwin...
Isn't a fundamental rule of genetics broken here: if you don't have children, won't your genetic traits die with you?
Up until recently, the likelihood of gays having children was nil. Especially, including all of human history.
Of course, there were those who were bisexual. However, you would expect that eventually there would be fewer and fewer of them too.
In fact, they've every incentive to create a strictly bio link given the politics involved. (Also, the public never sees studies about the family histories of gay people ... especially focusing on relationships w/ the father; I wonder why that is ...)