Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1945 Battle of Manila (Anti-US Military BARRF Alert!)
INQ7 ^ | 1/31/05 | William Esposo

Posted on 01/31/2005 7:21:27 PM PST by qam1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Harpo Speaks

Yeah, the residents of Agana (Guam), Tokyo (Japan), Dresden (Germany), Stalingrad (Russia), etc., might put up an argument, too.

The author is obviously Filipino-centric in his viewpoint. Reasonable to still hate the Japanese for what they did, but stupid to hate the Americans for stopping them. Thank goodness that territory isn't our responsibility any more, with idiots like that living there.


21 posted on 01/31/2005 8:02:48 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: qam1

'it was obvious that shells raining around the area were US shells directed at the Japanese'

The King has no conscience.


22 posted on 01/31/2005 8:03:34 PM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1
THIS February will mark the 60th anniversary of the unwarranted death of over 100,000 civilians whose lives were sacrificed in the 1945 Battle of Manila.

THIS is what the Twentieth Century Atlas has about World War II casulaties in ALL of the Phillippines

# Philippines

* Military:
o Britannica: 27,000
o Eckhardt: 27,000
* Civilian:
o Britannica: 91,000
o Eckhardt: 91,000

Guess they all died in the retaking of Manila < /sarcasm>

23 posted on 01/31/2005 8:12:38 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

Many Filipinos want to rejoin the United States as the 51st State!! If "they" hate us, why would they want that?

http://philippinegovantigraft.homestead.com/Statehood.html
http://philippinegovantigraft.homestead.com/StatehoodA.html
http://philippinegovantigraft.homestead.com/StatehoodB.html
http://philippinegovantigraft.homestead.com/StatehoodC.html
http://www.gov.ph/forum/thread.asp?rootID=22004&catID=11&page=2


24 posted on 01/31/2005 8:18:13 PM PST by The Loan Arranger (The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger

They don't hate us...


25 posted on 01/31/2005 8:23:17 PM PST by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: qam1
"Babies were flung to the air and skewered by bayonets as they fell."

I remember my grandmother telling me that in WWl there was this story about the Huns. She was not German but she seemed to think that it was later accepted that this was war propoganda. Now whenever I read that about any army (no matter how obviously atrocious they were)I wonder if those particular stories are made up. ...

26 posted on 01/31/2005 8:26:24 PM PST by withteeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger
Hopefully this is just one lone nutball writing this article.

But I like this line from one of your links

"For the Philippines, it's better to be bigger by becoming a member of the United States than being a beggar by remaining a member of the United Nations."

But about Statehood, The Philppines have a population of 86,241,697, So if they ever did become a state they would get ~¼ of the Seats in the House of Representives, So I don't think we would go along with it.

27 posted on 01/31/2005 8:29:56 PM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: qam1

We would have to split them up into three or four states, IMHO.


28 posted on 01/31/2005 8:35:35 PM PST by The Loan Arranger (The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Tomoyuki Yamashita ordered the Imperial Navy troops and Imperial Marines in Manila to retreat and leave it an open city (He was running the defense of Luzon from an HQ out in the jungle). They disobeyed, and went on a rampage (not a novelty where the Japanese were concerned). Yamashita paid for that command breakdown with his life after his post-war trial in Manila, and established the legal principle that anti war yo yos tried to use to hang Calley on Westmoreland. Not ONE Filipino leader EVER accused MacArthur, or any US commander of causing, directly or indirectly, the deaths in Manila. Where do they find this bilge?
29 posted on 01/31/2005 9:06:54 PM PST by PzLdr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertarianInExile

Good synopsis. The Battle of Manila was brutal and vicious, the only "big city" land battle of the Pacific War, and compared to our forces in the ETO, our combat troops in the Philippines had little or no training or experience in urban warfare.

Unlike battles like Stalingrad, where most of the civilian population was evacuated beforehand, Manila was crammed full of civilians; those who were trying to get away from the battle were a lot of the ones being slaughtered by the Japanese, and some of the ones staying in the city were unfortunately, killed in American air and artillery bombardments.

War is Hell. We won the war. Japan surrendered unconditionally.

God Bless Gen. MacArthur, he was brilliant commander and strategist.


30 posted on 01/31/2005 9:07:52 PM PST by wolficatZ (Alien vs Star Trek-Voyager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wolficatZ

And when the bombardment started, who prevented the Manila residents from leaving the city and avoiding the bombardment? Not the Americans. The Japanese. The Japanese were using these civilians as a human shield, deliberately digging in among the civilian population, so the responsibility for any deaths resides with the Japanese.

This article meets the modern definition of "stupid": "Something SO dumb only a Lefty would believe it".


31 posted on 01/31/2005 9:14:58 PM PST by CivilWarguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: withteeth
"Babies were flung to the air and skewered by bayonets as they fell."
 
I have a video with a Filipino woman describing what she saw, exactly this actrocity; I seriously doubt she is making her eyewitness account up.
 
World War II Collection. Beverly Hills, CA, Fox Video/CBS News, 1996. 5 videocassettes.
H. Norman Schwarzkopf, Charles Kuralt, and Dan Rather host this series using documentary footage and interviews. Volume One: The Year of the Generals-(includes profiles of Eisenhower, Patton, Bradley, MacArthur, Rommel, etc.)
 

32 posted on 01/31/2005 9:29:02 PM PST by wolficatZ (Alien vs Star Trek-Voyager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: withteeth

Yes I remember hearing how the atrocities committed by the 'frightful Hun' during the First World War were just propaganda. The only thing is that recent research has proven that they were true! The Germans did massacre many Belgian civilians during their occupation and did 'rape' the city of Louvain. It would be a bit difficult in the light of their behaviour twenty years later that the German army became such a bunch of barbarians over night. And please spare me the claim that the Wehrmacht were honourable soldiers and that it was just the SS that committed atrocities, the regular German troops and policemen were fully involved in slaughtering innocent civilians.

The Japanese however made the Germans look like Sunday school teachers. If you don't believe what they did then read Iris Chang's 'The Rape of Nanking'it even has photos for the disbelievers.


33 posted on 01/31/2005 9:58:04 PM PST by PotatoHeadMick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

While there’s a lot of BS in this article. There’s also a lot of truth to it.
The whole invasion of the PI was unnecessary.
US plans called to hop over PI to Japan.
MacArthur convinced the Prez. to let him keep his “ I Shall Return” promise.
The lives lost on all sides was nothing more that a photo op for MacArthur.

MacArthur was a bumbling primadonna idiot.
Not only did he lose the PI having superior forces and the initiative. Just to prove the first time wasn’t a fluke. He almost did the same in Korea.


34 posted on 01/31/2005 10:20:15 PM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: qam1; The Loan Arranger

The Filipinos already have an American territory, anyway. It's called Guam. Why would we give them 1/4 of the Congress in exchange for territory we would have to stretch like hell to defend and 80 million more poor people that would be begging for federal aid?

Yeah, what a deal that would be, where do we sign? /sarcasm


35 posted on 01/31/2005 10:24:55 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: The Loan Arranger

Good lord, just reading the 'here's the what the U.S. will do for us' list on this link: http://philippinegovantigraft.homestead.com/StatehoodA.html gives me nightmares. The worst is the part where they claim that U.S. law enforcement will reduce corruption. Yeah, because it's worked so well in King County, Chicago, and D.C.


36 posted on 01/31/2005 10:28:37 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PotatoHeadMick
"please spare me"

No, I'm not pushing any opinion. Just had a historical question...

37 posted on 01/31/2005 10:33:28 PM PST by withteeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wolficatZ

Japan didn't surrender unconditionally.

Hirohito should have danced on air like his generals. He was every bit the war criminal Tojo was. And until the Japs take down their Yasukuni shrine museum b.s. about how the Rape of Nanking was a police action to restore order, and how they were forced into the war, I'm not about to buy into Japan as a peaceful country that should be allowed to rearm, either. Roosevelt wasn't my favorite president by any means, but he never fired a shot at the Japs and I'll be darned if I'll ever forgive their sneak attack on us or their poor treatment of our soldiers and American internees.


38 posted on 01/31/2005 10:49:20 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Veto!

Want to have a little fun next time you hear one of these leftist revisionists from the PI speaking out for there people?

Ask them “ Are you from Japan ? You look Japanese! “ If they give you a blank look & answer No I’m from the Philippines. Try once more and say “ Oh you look Japanese “
If there not going for your throat by then. You know they haven’t got a clue.


39 posted on 01/31/2005 11:06:52 PM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit

Oh, c'mon, Leningrad was a squirtgun fight! :P

< /sarcasm>


40 posted on 01/31/2005 11:17:28 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson