Skip to comments.
Manufacturing expands: 20 straight months
AP
Posted on 02/01/2005 7:13:04 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50, 51-70 last
To: Willie Green
Still waiting Willie. Could you please answer the following questions...
Were more goods manufactured in the United States in 2004 than in 2003?
Were more goods manufactured in the United States in 2003 than in 2002?
51
posted on
02/01/2005 11:46:49 AM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: Toddsterpatriot
I'm only guessing here, but I think the sample size that the US Department of Commerce used is larger than Willie Green Now, now. Willie's sample size is greater than just himself. He also interviewed those on the MagLev with him. So his sample size was the conductor and himself.
52
posted on
02/01/2005 11:47:53 AM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: Willie Green
So this is what you've come to Willie? You've been marginalized with such success and slipped so far down the rabbit hole, that no product from the ACME Corp. (and their international manufacturing divisions) could get you out now.
Do you the manufacturing industry a favor, Mr. green, and manufacture yourself some new ideas, new attitude toward economic freedom & interdependence, and new opinions on the proper role of government.
53
posted on
02/01/2005 11:53:04 AM PST
by
LowCountryJoe
(Many things in moderation, some with conservation, few in immoderation, all because of liberation!)
To: Phantom Lord
There's been no dramatic increase in manufacturing output to offset the collapse of the textile and furniture industries, let alone the outsourcing that has occurred in other manufacturing sectors (including high tech), so the answer to you questions would have to be "no".
54
posted on
02/01/2005 11:58:30 AM PST
by
Willie Green
(Go Pat Go!!!)
To: LowCountryJoe

All these years I thought it was Wiley Coyote. It was really Willie Coyote. Notice the 100% American origin of the Acme rocket.
55
posted on
02/01/2005 12:00:08 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
To: SoFloFreeper
Look for this good news to be on CBS tonight. I don't think a whole lot of people are hee hee hee.
56
posted on
02/01/2005 12:01:16 PM PST
by
Tribune7
To: Phantom Lord
Were more goods manufactured in the United States in 2004 than in 2003? Were more goods manufactured in the United States in 2003 than in 2002? But if I start out with one penny in the bank and compound it at even 10% interest, it'll be a long time 'til I'm into wealth. So what I'm saying is the manufacturing activity in the U.S. is still far too low, even if growing. It's nowhere near the league it should be, other than a few areas like auto production where there is actually over-production spurred by artificially low interest rates.
57
posted on
02/01/2005 12:01:47 PM PST
by
steve86
To: SoFloFreeper
Do they still count building hamburgers as manufacturing?
58
posted on
02/01/2005 12:08:24 PM PST
by
ichabod1
(The Spirit of the Lord Hath Left This Place)
To: SoFloFreeper
Economists say that the economy grew in 2004 at a rate of 4.4%, below expectations.
59
posted on
02/01/2005 12:09:32 PM PST
by
ichabod1
(The Spirit of the Lord Hath Left This Place)
To: Willie Green
Willie, your about as disengenious a poster as I have ever run across. And your penchant for ignoring facts is astounding.
No wonder your a fan of the choo choo.
60
posted on
02/01/2005 12:10:06 PM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: ichabod1
Do they still count building hamburgers as manufacturing? Have they ever? Source please.
61
posted on
02/01/2005 12:10:56 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
To: ichabod1
Do they still count building hamburgers as manufacturing? It isn't the teenager putting burger to bun that got counted as manufacturing but the actual manufacturing of the patty.
62
posted on
02/01/2005 12:11:27 PM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: Phantom Lord
And your penchant for ignoring facts is astounding. Willie doesn't need facts, both his friends said the economy was going downhill.
63
posted on
02/01/2005 12:12:18 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
To: Toddsterpatriot
I believe, and i am clearly open to correction on this, that the actual manufactur of the burger patty has been included in manufacturing numbers.
Not the process of putting the burger on the bun and McDonalds, BK, Wendys, etc...
I could be way off though.
64
posted on
02/01/2005 12:12:26 PM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: dakine
WE'RE ALL GOING TO BE REPLACED BY MACHIIIIIINES!
65
posted on
02/01/2005 12:13:01 PM PST
by
ichabod1
(The Spirit of the Lord Hath Left This Place)
To: Toddsterpatriot
You don't remember this little gem of a story from last year?
Brace yourself for this one...
White House economists wonder whether hamburger flippers at fast-food restaurants should be considered manufacturers.
In the report last week, Bush's chief economic adviser N. Gregory Mankiw called the definition "somewhat blurry" and asked whether it should be changed. "When a fast-food restaurant sells a hamburger, for example, is it providing a 'service' or is it combining inputs to 'manufacture' a product?"
For an administration that has seen 2.6 million manufacturing jobs vanish since January 2001, raising the possibility of changing how manufacturing jobs are classified has provoked a sharp response, especially in an election year.
When Mankiw's remarks came out this week, Democrats had a field day. In Ohio, presidential hopeful Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) said: "If this president is going to tell middle-class factory workers that even though their job has disappeared, they can still have a good manufacturing job at $5.15 an hour at McDonald's, let him come to Ohio."
66
posted on
02/01/2005 12:18:19 PM PST
by
ichabod1
(The Spirit of the Lord Hath Left This Place)
To: ichabod1
You don't remember this little gem of a story from last year? Gee, I read your entire story and didn't see where it said that hamburger flipping was now considered manufacturing. Maybe you should highlight that part so I can see it better.
67
posted on
02/01/2005 12:24:58 PM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
To: SoFloFreeper
68
posted on
02/01/2005 12:25:28 PM PST
by
Pagey
(Hillary talking about the bible,is as hypocritical as Bill carrying one out of church for 8 years)
To: ichabod1
How funny. You answered your own question. And not merely in the negative, mind you, but defeating its own premise as well.
69
posted on
02/01/2005 12:53:54 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: BearWash
But if I start out with one penny in the bank and compound it at even 10% interest, it'll be a long time 'til I'm into wealth. So what I'm saying is the manufacturing activity in the U.S. is still far too low, even if growing.Just how high should manufacturing go?

Just because Willie Green can't find American made goods doesn't mean they aren't there.
70
posted on
02/02/2005 9:19:25 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Protectionism is economic ignorance!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50, 51-70 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson