Posted on 02/01/2005 9:13:41 AM PST by technomage
They should just send Jessie Jackson.
It is strange that they didn't.
Because we are a member of the Security Council.
Bush should just say "No."
Wouldn't that just tweak the Clintonianan cultists?
Smorgasbord for Clinton. Women of all colors, nationalities, languages. He must be delirious with joy.
Just what the UN needs - another CROOK, SLUT, LIAR, APPEASER .. Hmmmm? He seems to fit right in!
Means nothing on the world stage and I doubt the U.N. cares much what conservatives think. He was not fired thanks to the liberals in the Senate. He was a two-termer President which puts him in an very elite club of which he is the only living member (besides Bush which just started his second term).
O.K. Thanks.
I feel that is his goal. Many of us here have felt that way for many years.
It all makes sense when one sees how he's tried to subjugate us to the UN, weaken our armed forces.
Regards.
Are you saying the un keeps money under the table and not in a bank? hehe
Holy Smokes, if he would ever become SG, think of all the foreign fillies who work there????? OOOOEEE
Well--that, and the Clintoons have always taken money under the table, under the bed, under the.....mmmmmm, better stop!
Oh is this to help finance the Clintons return to the White House?
Given the trouble the UN has with its "Sex for Food" scandal, the UN's EU "peacekeeper" sex troubles,
what is Annan thinking when he picked a womanizer?
To rub it in real Americans' noses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.