Rummy made a good call here.
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Another excellent Rummy decision!
2 posted on
02/01/2005 8:20:44 PM PST by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
ABSO-FREAKIN-LUTELY!
This is something even the environmentalists should be supporting, after all - who could possibly be opposed to the concept of keeping Hiroshima/Nagasaki-sizeed damage below ground, and avoiding atmospheric contamination, while eliminating the toxic social pollution caused by maggots like Kim Jong ILL and other tin-horn dictators of his ilk?
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Somebody has been remembering there Goldwater teachings well.
4 posted on
02/01/2005 8:24:58 PM PST by
Sonny M
("oderint dum metuant")
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
5 posted on
02/01/2005 8:28:22 PM PST by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Smokin'!!
U.S. Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld (shown in a Jan. 26
photo with Senator John Warner (R-Va.)
has expressed support for completing
a study into nuclear bunker-busting bombs
(AFP photo/Brendan Smialowski).
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Well, it's like this. We Yankees can develop nice, new, quiet penetrators, or we can use the good, old cratering devices when the time comes to use one or the other. I'm all for letting the complaining world decide (in favor of my favorite old devices), but then I'm not as nice as our Secretary of Defense. I think our older ones make the sky prettier.
10 posted on
02/01/2005 9:30:05 PM PST by
familyop
("Let us try" sounds better, don't you think? "Essayons" is so...Latin.)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
It's needed.
We can't penetrate deep enough so we need a blast large enough to still have the desired affect. It's hard to pound deep into the earth.
Red6
14 posted on
02/02/2005 8:02:07 AM PST by
Red6
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson