Posted on 02/03/2005 4:20:37 PM PST by Laissez-faire capitalist
A team of researchers funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have just published a study that claims to have mapped the human genome and discovered chromosomes related to sexual orientation in males.
The study, "A genomewide scan of male sexual orientation," was led by homosexual researcher Dr. Dean Hamer and other pro-homosexual associates.
Dr. A. Dean Byrd, a member of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) Scientific Advisory Committee reviewed the study and concluded: "The researchers' attempt to manipulate the data to come up with something meaningful was not realized. They find nothing and yet they insist that they might find something. Good science begins with a strong hypothesis not with a 'fishing expedition.'
What a surprise - a vital conflict of interest.
Implying that genetic engineering can be used to solve the problem?
Ping!
To see the in-depth article at NARTH dealing with this genome scan, go to http://www.narth.com/docs/genome.html
The fact of the matter is that it matters not what the cause is -- those with this condition are called to chastity.
So can you abort homo babies?
The article at Narth dealing with the genome scan and its 'findings.'
http://www.narth.com/docs/genome.html
It would be interesting if they did find the "gay gene". Then people can start prenatal testing for and then aborting genetically damaged (aka. "gay") fetuses. Let the pro-abortion, gay agenda promoting liberals choke on that one.
Or, depending on what ideology is in power, the inverse.
The genetic engineers and politicians of the future might come up with some requirements to match their agendas - 95% homosexual births, 5% "breeders" - artificially inseminated, of course (see "Brave New World"). This way the genetic makeup of the race would be controlled.
Ping!
I thought that you also might want to read about the newest 'fishing expedition' dealt with at TVC and Narth.
http://www.narth.com/docs/genome.html
Do you think that the liberals would be saying "her body, her choice" then?
I doubt it.
People who do not believe in abortion would treat this matter in the same way as if they were going to have a baby with Down's syndrome (or any other diability). It may be a tough road ahead, but with love, patience & faith, any decent human can rise ro the challenge of good parenting.
Liberals would be more likely to abort "oppressive patriarchal heterosexual blobs of tissue" than gay babies.
Sure, blame the midgets and genomes. I'm tired of the little people getting all the heat. Sure, they're the right height for a lot of deviant behavior, but that doesn't mean they're game. ;)
diability = disability
Or is it an extension of guys "refusing to stop and ask directions"?
Ok, it's not...
The fact of the matter is that it matters not what the cause is -- those with this condition are called to chastity.
The fact of the matter is that it matters not what the cause is -- those with this condition are called to chastity.
The fact of the matter is that it matters not what the cause is -- those with this condition are called to chastity.
Bears repeating. If you're not in an "opposing-gender" marriage, you're called to be celibate. EVERYONE is called to be chaste.
You are ignoring the fact that they are big phonies. They push public education but send their kids to private schools if they can. They want gun control but make sure they are protected by gun-toters if they can.
They would also wear their multicolored scarf on the way to the abortion mill to get rid of that gay baby.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.