Posted on 02/03/2005 10:37:05 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
I only recentlydiscovered rbnlive.com I've listened so far to Jack Blood but not the others, although I have heard Jack McLamb being interviewed on another program.
I regularly listen to the archives of Michael Corbin's 4acloserlook.com because his guests are so informative. I also listen to Steve Quayle each day. Also listen to Coast to Coast A.M. and Jeff Rense when they don't have outre guests. If I get addicted to any more programs I'll be housebound and worthless. Sure have learned a lot listening to those folks though.
Whoa! Using google to spell-check "sovereignty," I found Sovereignty International which appears to be yet another great resource.
Time to go pay some bills, before they cut off our utilities.
newswithviews.com material not welcome on FR.
WTF is up with that?
News With Views has had some great and timely articles. For example, they've published Joan Veon's articles, and I believe Frosty Wooldridge as well.
Sorry that they are unwelcome at FR. Wonder why.
How can enforcing our laws be "unwelcome" at this place?
Has Alberto Josef Mengele Gonzalez been appointed a mod here?
I can tell you've been listening to Alex!!!
Obviously you tried to post from NWV's. You might want to try to repost directly from Frosty's website and see what happens.
Of course, I listen.
You should have mail, btw.
Thanks, just jammed in Genesis to check it out.
Thanks for the heads-up. I'll tune in the archived program.
I failed to thank you for the link to Sovereignty International'and the Timeline to the NWO. There's a gold mine of truth there.
Will tune in tomorrow afternoon to hear John Stadtmiller and Dessie Andrews.
In their own words:
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications who directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years but the world is now more sophisticated & prepared to march towards a world government which will never again know war but only peace and prosperity for the whole of authority."
-- David Rockefeller, CFR/Bilderberg/TC, 5 June 1991.
ACTION ALERT
February 8, 2005
Are the terrorists winning? [Yes, the legislative terrorists within Bush government are winning]. When "al-Qaeda" [al-CIA-duh] attacked the United States on September 11, 2001, they made it clear they hate [constitutional] America and want to terrorize us into changing America [and have]. [More like a coupe d'tat from within!].
If they could [and they can], the terrorists [and you know who they are] would destroy the unique American way of life [and they are]. But they can't [by themselves]. Only we [Fed Congress and State government actually] can do that.
Tragically, too much of the [anti-constitutional and tyrannical] legislation enacted by Congress in a knee-jerk reaction to [the Operation] 9/11 [plan] does "al-Qaeda's" job for them. The [anti]Patriot Act took the first, disastrous [and lethal] step toward fundamentally changing our way of life. Then came the Homeland Security [i.e. Gestapo] bill, followed by the 9/11 intelligence reorganization bill. ['9/11 intelligence' is an oxy-moron]. And now the Real ID Act of 2005 (H.R. 418) will be voted on Thursday, February 10th --[PATRIOT INQUISITION BILL].
What's wrong with H.R. 418 -- a bill we are told will stem the flow of illegal aliens [like Vincent (the) Fox] through our porous borders? For starters, it does NOTHING to stem the flow of illegal aliens. Instead, H.R. 418 will:
1. Establish a national ID card [where "Membership has its privileges"].
2. Establish a federally-coordinated database of personal information on American citizens with Canada and Mexico [your already being tracked by SS# and DL at the border...they know where you work].
3. Use the new national ID to track American citizens when traveling outside the U.S. -- and within the U.S.(Canada, Great Britain, Mexico, etc.)
4. Re-define "terrorism" in broad new terms that could include members of firearms rights and anti-abortion groups or other such groups as determined by whoever is in power at the time.
5. Authorize the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to unilaterally expand the information included in driver's licenses, including such biometric information as retina scans and DNA information -- and even radio frequency identification (RFID) tracking technology. Carry a driver's license with RFID and governmental officials will know your whereabouts 24/7.
Incredibly, H.R. 418 does nothing to solve the growing threat to national security posed by people who are already in the U.S. illegally. Instead, H.R. 418 states what we already know: that certain people here illegally are "deportable." But it does nothing to mandate deportation. H.R. 418 fails miserably on this most critical issue.
The Real ID Act or Real National ID Act will impose a Soviet-style internal passport on law-abiding American citizens. Proponents of H.R. 418 say we must "make sacrifices" like this to control our borders and fight illegal immigration. But H.R. 418 is a Trojan horse -- it pretends to offer desperately needed border control in order to stampede Americans into sacrificing what is uniquely American: more of our constitutionally protected liberty. H.R. 418 does what al-Qaeda could never do without our help.
H.R. 418 does what legislation restricting firearm ownership does. [Exactly]. It punishes law-abiding citizens [pre-booking them as criminal arrests, invading privacy, quartering soldiers at checkpoints, and legalizing unwarrantable "search and seizure"]. Criminals will ignore it. H.R. 418 offers us a false sense of greater security at the cost of taking a gigantic step toward making America a police state. The terrorists [are just about to and] will have won.
Urge your U.S. representative to vote "no" [because its contrary to their oath of office, and you are watching them, and no longer tolerant of this] on H.R. 418. Go to http://capwiz.com/liberty/issues/alert/?alertid=6938731&type=CO
Kent Snyder The Liberty Committee http://www.thelibertycommittee.org
A very, very interesting paragraph. There is no doubt in my mind that this is true and continues today by the MSM.
One question,if I may. Who is the "whole of authority"?
"...only peace and prosperity for the whole of authority."
Hmmm. Sounds to me as though peace and prosperity is limited to those who are in authority. What would conditions be like for those who are not in authority? I shudder to even think of the oppression.
Isn't it interesting that over the years that our elected officials have in turn established authorities, such as airport authority, housing authority, etc. and appointed individuals to head such authorities who are completely autonomous and answer to the voters for nothing.
Here's another quote, this one from Henry Kissinger.
"Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government." -- Henry Kissinger speaking at Evian, France, May 21, 1992 Bilderburgers meeting. Unbeknownst to Kissinger, his speech was taped by a Swiss delegate to the meeting.
Heinz Kissinger has lots of outstanding thoughts out there, of course, he was this regime's first choice to head up the 911 CoverupCommission...our rulers are so totally "in your face" these days.
G'day all.
Cheers.
To be quite honest, I had never thought about "authority" in any such manner. Yes, we do have a whole lot of "authorities" with committees and sub-committees, regions and sub-regions. Huge isn't exactly the word for the UN. It is more like obese.
The sentences that really gets to me from H. Kisinger: This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil.
I guess he would use David Rockefellow's MSM since they are already bought and paid for.
What is MSM? Notice that you indicate you're a has-been Republican. Does that mean that you too, have resigned from the party?
Recommend that you refer to Lodwick's #763 post wherein he links "Timeline to Global Governance." Whoever compiled that timeline did an awesome job.
MainStreamMedia aka MainStreamNews
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.