He is "show business" more in the sense of what makes a successful show than mere money, IMO. I've listened from his beginnings in SF and he's often described his analysis, his style, and his methods.
I believe him when he tells of his reason for entering talk radio. He tells the story from time to time.
There has not been anyone like him since Joe Pyne though we here in Sacramento have Mark Williams to help counter the opposite end of conservative radio: Republican Party hacks pretending to be talk radio hosts. IMO.
I'm shocked that nobody commented on post #47 from this thread. That post stopped me in my tracks. It should be required viewing for all high school history students.
What an eye opener.
I agree. Mike's intensity is worth preserving. I still think he's mostly showbiz...but, hey, that's what it takes to get heard.