Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Euthanasia: Who Needs It?
The Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity ^ | 1/31/05 | Sharon A. Falkenheimer

Posted on 02/05/2005 5:04:20 PM PST by wagglebee

Do people really want doctors to help them end their lives in times of pain and illness? To listen to the media or read the press, you certainly would think so. Advocates of euthanasia argue that if people are given a choice between dying in agonizing pain or undergoing euthanasia/physician assisted suicide (PAS), the preferred choice would be euthanasia/PAS. Indeed, few people would choose to die in agony, except possibly Jesus, as the recent movie The Passion of the Christ has so graphically re-enacted.

However, the presentation of only these two extreme alternatives is deeply biased. Agonizing pain and euthanasia/PAS are not the only ways people die. A wide range of choices and experiences exist between these extremes including adequate treatment of pain and other bothersome symptoms (so-called "palliative care"), hospice care at home or in a medical facility, and even sedation to the point of complete anesthesia and unconsciousness (known as "terminal sedation"). Questions, like this one, frequently are meant to be misleading. One choice is set up to be so unpalatable (i.e., dying in agony) that it makes the other option (euthanasia/PAS) seem acceptable in comparison. However, when considered separately, a physician’s assistance in death would be judged unacceptable. Fear of the dreaded alternative may motivate a respondent to make an immoral choice. Posing questions in this way is an old trick that is easily anticipated when only polar alternatives are presented.

Regardless of whether euthanasia/PAS is desired by most people or even viewed as moral, it has been legalized in the Netherlands, Belgium, and the U.S. State of Oregon. The irony of the Netherlands being the first nation to legalize the practice is lost on many who are unfamiliar with the history of medical practice in that nation. In the Nazi era, 98% of Dutch physicians refused to conform or participate when ordered by the Germans to become members of its Nazi-led, anti-Semitic medical society and thereby lost their authority to practice medicine. Now it is their medical heirs who are the leading the world in the acceptance and practice of PAS!

Many predicted abuses of PAS have come to pass and are increasingly well documented. These include physicians failing to follow one or more of the mandated regulations for administering PAS. The requirements are that (1) the patient is in "unbearable suffering," (2) no other effective alternative treatment is available, (3) two physicians agree that PAS is indicated, (4) the patient requesting PAS is competent, not depressed, and not pressured by others, and (5) that all cases of PAS are reported to the authorities. Most alarmingly, some physicians have decided to administer PAS when neither the patient nor family has requested it.

However, recent trends indicate a shift in the practice. A recent survey of 1,500 physicians in the Netherlands by a professor at Nijmegen University reported that euthanasia/PAS is waning in their country. Due to improvements in palliative care and pain relief, it is increasingly rare for Dutch physicians to see medical indications for euthanasia or PAS. This should not be a surprise. Over 2,000 years ago, Hippocrates recognized the importance of ensuring that physicians gave exclusive attention to patients’ needs and did not participate in harming them in any way. Attending to patients’ needs certainly does not include helping to kill them.

This "Hippocratic" form of medicine initially was a minority practice at a time when both medical and spiritual care were often under a single individual, such as a shaman, who might bless or curse a person seeking assistance. Hippocratic medicine was entered into by swearing an oath that proscribed, among other things, giving poison to a patient (a form of PAS). This oath has, of course, become known as the Hippocratic Oath, and though originally sworn to Greek deities, has been adopted in a slightly modified form by Jewish, Christian, and Muslim medical practitioners. Though increasingly watered down to conform to current societal mores, the Hippocratic Oath is foundational to Western medicine. It recognizes what Dr. William Osler later more succinctly put into words: "The secret of caring for the patient is caring for the patient." Studies have shown that it is not euthanasia/PAS that patients want, but optimum pain relief, end of life care, and the assurance that their physician will not abandon them.

The push for legalized euthanasia/PAS is, to a great extent, the result of a failure of medical training and practice. Only recently have the relief of pain, optimum palliative care, and the availability of hospice services become a high priorities. Medical societies, such as the American Medical Association, are working to ensure that all physicians are trained adequately in pain relief and end of life care. Bemoaning past failures to provide this type of care will do little to help our current patients. Even the most active proponents increasingly recognize that the legalization of euthanasia and PAS is more reflective of a failure than a solution. One can only hope that the increasing rejection of physician participation in euthanasia and PAS will spread and initiate a recognition of and return to the wisdom of Hippocratic values in patient care.

Sharon A. Falkenheimer, M.A., M.D., M.P.H., is President of Bioethics & Medicine, Inc. and a Fellow of The Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: assistedsuicide; euthanasia; medicalethics; netherlands; terri; terrischiavo
In the Nazi era, 98% of Dutch physicians refused to conform or participate when ordered by the Germans to become members of its Nazi-led, anti-Semitic medical society and thereby lost their authority to practice medicine. Now it is their medical heirs who are the leading the world in the acceptance and practice of PAS!

The leftists should be forced to acknowledge what Nazism really was and then they will understand that they are the successors to Hitler, not conservatives.

1 posted on 02/05/2005 5:04:21 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

+euthanasia should be legal for Muslims!


2 posted on 02/05/2005 5:07:44 PM PST by claptrap (optional tagline under re-consideration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

There is a big difference between euthanesia and assisted suicide.


3 posted on 02/05/2005 5:07:50 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I have always been opposed to euthanasia. I think America's young people should stay in this country.


4 posted on 02/05/2005 5:19:17 PM PST by donozark (I've never had an original thought in my life. In fact, just the other day, I was thinking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Hillary!™


5 posted on 02/05/2005 5:20:05 PM PST by null and void (God must love stupid people - He made so many of them... (Not enough to win an election!) -restornu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Do people really want doctors to help them end their lives in times of pain and illness?

You want to personally clean up the mess after someone has to eat their gun? Choose now!

6 posted on 02/05/2005 5:30:19 PM PST by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
So how does the Left account for it's hypocrisy in being in favor of euthanasia for the elderly and unborn but not for criminals and terrorists?
7 posted on 02/05/2005 5:36:36 PM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
So how does the Left account for it's hypocrisy in being in favor of euthanasia for the elderly and unborn but not for criminals and terrorists?

They don't want to kill any potential voters.

8 posted on 02/05/2005 5:38:51 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
They don't want to kill any potential voters.

Well, it sure has been proved that the criminals vote for the dims as can be seen in the Washington state governor's "race".

9 posted on 02/05/2005 5:45:44 PM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Euthanasia: Who Needs It?

Do you mean who needs them?


10 posted on 02/05/2005 6:27:00 PM PST by w6ai5q37b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"Euthanasia: Who Needs It?"

I've got a little list.....

11 posted on 02/05/2005 6:28:34 PM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Euthanasia: Who Needs It?

I have a list, if anyone's interested.

12 posted on 02/05/2005 6:29:27 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
Spooky...

Oh and you aren't on mine...

yet.

13 posted on 02/05/2005 6:30:09 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

I lied about the "little" part


14 posted on 02/05/2005 6:43:26 PM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Yeah, I had to write mine on toilet paper just for the room.


15 posted on 02/05/2005 6:49:37 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

bookmart


16 posted on 02/05/2005 10:20:20 PM PST by Trinity_Tx (Most of our so-called reasoning consists in finding arguments for going on believin as we already do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donozark

LOL!


17 posted on 02/07/2005 12:16:30 PM PST by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson