Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Motherbear

You are about right. I whacked my kids past the age of 5 or 6, but not by much. What's more, no one should touch a kid when he is mad. For the most part, there are very few times when any adult should get mad at a kid who is less than about 12 or 13 years old and well before that time, if you have not taught them right from wrong, then you have lost them anyway.

Use corporal punishment, but only do so rarely, else it will lose its effectiveness. Legitimate corporal punishment causes very little physical pain.


35 posted on 02/06/2005 6:09:24 PM PST by Backwoods Southern Lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Backwoods Southern Lawyer
I'm sorry, but 13 is the age for smacking. That's when kids get rude and obnoxious.
40 posted on 02/06/2005 6:19:23 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( There's no Double Talk from Dubya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: Backwoods Southern Lawyer

"Use corporal punishment, but only do so rarely, else it will lose its effectiveness."

Exactly. What worked for me were my mom's THREATS to spank me. She rarely needed to, but I understood that she would, if pressed. If such things were outlawed, such threats wouldn't work too well.

What's more, she often combined the combined the threat with humiliation, too - "Do you want me to pull your pants down and spank you right here in public?" - in such a way that would gall any touchy-feely, self-esteem types - but it was 100% effective.


48 posted on 02/06/2005 6:29:48 PM PST by mathchick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson