Skip to comments.The Difference Between Iranians And Arabs
Posted on 02/07/2005 1:53:33 PM PST by freedom44
Many Americans seem to entertain the illusion that Iranians are Arabs. This may be due to the fact that many people in both communities practise Islam, which I'll mention below. Another coincidence that may have contributed to this confusion is the apparent similarity of the names Iran and Iraq. It is true that the Persian language and the Arabic share the same alphabet, namely the Arabic alphabet, which was imposed upon the Iranians centuries ago. But originally Persian had its own alphabet. Anyway, in Arabic script the names of the countries are entirely different, 'Iraq' beginning with the letter 'ain' and 'Iran' beginning with the letter 'alif'. The words 'Iranian' and 'Persian' are virtually synonymous, the former being the preferred term nowadays.
The Arabic word 'Iraq' means 'Veins' and, apparently, refers to the Euphrates and the Tigris Rivers.
But the clincher is that the word 'Iran' is cognate with the English word 'Aryan', as the Iranians are Aryan, that is, Indo-European, while the Arabs, as is well known, are Semitic, so ethnologically there's a definite disjunction. The Indo-European languages, which probably coincide in fair measure with ethnicity, are divided into Centum and Satem groups. Centum languages further divide into Germanic, Italic, Celtic and Greek, while Satem languages divide into Balto-Slavic, Indo-Iranian, Albanian and Armenian. Thus we find among Indo-European languages such widely divergent specimens as English, German, Spanish, French, Greek, Russian, Persian (Farsi), Hindi and many others. There are a great number of Arabic loan words in Persian, just as there are a great number of Latin loan words in English, but no one classifies English as an Italic language, nor should anyone classify Persian as a Semitic language. There are Persian loan words in Arabic too, but etymological dictionaries of the Arabic language are scarce, if they exist at all, and one is often left guessing which words might be from Persian.
Semitic languages are a subgroup of Afro-Asiatic languages. Only two strictly Semitic languages survive--Arabic and Hebrew. Extinct Semitic languages include Assyrian, Phoenician, Aramaic and others. Among languages in other subgroups of the Afro-Asiatic languages are Amharic, Tigrinya and Hausa of Ethiopia, Chad and Nigeria.
This ethno-linguistic disjunction is not merely an academic hypothesis. I have met many, many Arabs and Iranians, and there is a definite Arab look and a definite Iranian look. It's not infallible, of course, but I think I could probably tell them apart 75% of the time.
But even more conclusive is the historical aspect. Now we know that all ethnic groups must have sprung from primitive human beings, so likely they're all of great antiquity. But when we speak of 'history', we generally mean written records. And here we see that Persians appear on the scene much in advance of Arabs.
Generally, Persian history is said to have begun with King Cyrus the Great, who unified Persia and conquered vast tracts of land. He is also famous for liberating the Jews from captivity in Babylon around 538 BC, as is amply recorded in the Bible, in the Books of Isaiah, Daniel and Ezra. The next four Persian kings were Cambyses, Darius, Xerxes and Artaxerxes, all in the Bible. These names are all in the Greco-English spellings. Xerxes, whose name is Khashayarsha in Persian, Achashverosh in Hebrew and Ahasuerus in the English Bible, is vividly portrayed in the Book of Esther as the rescuer of the Jews from the persecutions of Haman, which is celebrated to this day by Jews as Purim, the Feast of Lots. All of these kings are also famous for their exploits in the Middle East, Anatolia, Greece and Egypt. Much later, another Persian king, Shapur I, defeated the Roman emperor, Valerian. And their have been many, many others.
In antiquity, Persia had various religious, such as Zoroastrianism, Mithraism, Mazdaism and Manichaeism, all to be largely supplanted by Islam. A more recent Iranian religion is the Baha'i faith.
As far as I know, the Arabs enter history around 305 AD, with the Nabataean Inscriptions, but these are scant. Their real entrance into history was the appearance of Mohammed (570-632 AD) Arabs conquered Persia in the seventh century, spreading Islam. Subsequently, in the 10th and 11th century, Turks took over the leadership of Islam, so Islamic history is not strictly the same thing as Arabic history. In the coming centuries Islam would extend its sway all the way from China and Indonesia to Spain. But the Ottoman Empire, once the world's greatest power, was a Turkish, rather than Arabic or Persian, Islamic Sultanate.
So Iranians are definitely not Arabs.
Persians hate arabs with all their hearts.
There's an Arab population in Iran, just as there is in Iraq. It happened when Muslims conquered them and Islam subsumed their cultures in order to creat the foundations of the pseudo culture of Pan Arabism. Neither country is an Arab country.
Only 2% of Iranians are Arab - border of Iraq. Iranians and Iraqis look totally different and speak different language. Only similarity is the name and religion.
Iran was named after its race which is the "Aryan" race. The former shah of Iran was dethroned by the CIA because of his affinity with the Nazis during WW II. The CIA in turn installed his 21 year old shah was his replacement. Shah 2 was dethroned by the arrival of Ayatollah Khomenei.
If President Carter authorized the CIA to save the Shah 2 throne, the world would not have any terrorists today.
I should not put only the blame on just President Carter, but the Senate too who removed most of the capability of the CIA to enforce the US foreign policy secretly.
Remember the Iran-Contra?
After the Senate finished investigating Iran-Contra, the CIA was left with just bare bones.
That's the fact - Ask Senator Kerry!
Another difference is that Iranians will be glowing in the dark soon.
I had a Persian friend while I was in college. He made VERY VERY clear that Persians were not Arabs and that there was long standing disdain between the two cultures (long standing as in more than 1000 years).
Iran/Persia has been despotic throughout its history. The
great story of the West (democracy, free inquiry,
individualism, etc.) versus the East (despotism, tyranny)
is told by the great Greek historians Herodotus, Thucydides, and others. We owe much of the core values
of our civilization to the victories of the Greeks over
the Persians at Marathon, Salamis, etc. in the 5th century
B.C. The Persians detested the West even more after they
were defeated by Alexander the Great. As someone else once
said, "They forgot nothing and they learned nothing."
I think the only positive sign for Iran is that the
population is generally young and the youth hate the
mullahs. By the way, neither is Hungarian an Indo-European
Actually, Aramaic is still spoken to this day, namely by Christian communities in Iraq, Syria and probably Lebanon. Also, Amharic and Tigraynia are both Semitic languages, as well. South Semitic, I believe.
Iran isn't an Arab country, but Iraq is. After all, when the Arab Moslem armies subjugated it, not only the soldiers settled there but entire Arab tribes as well. The Shammar tribe is one of those tribes, and it's members consist of about 11 million Iraqis today.
read later bump
Persians think of Arabs the way English aristos think of Irishmen.
Don't mention the name "Alexander" to any Iranian. Alexander the Great clobbered the Persian kings to submission at the height of his conquest.
For that matter - the Greeks - an Iranian will have a hard time liking them too.
Iran is a multi-ethnic empire. I think that it was called the Persian Empire before it changed its name to Iran during WWII. Ethnic Persians only make up about half of the population, the rest being Azeris, Kurds, Arabs, Baluchis, Armenians and I don't know what else.
He could be used as an airbag in one of those cars if you could somehow get him to fit.
Actually I have noticed that the latter term is preferred by many Iranians in the US who are trying to keep a low profile. This was especially true in the years following the hostage crisis.
There’s a problem with your history. You say the Persians came about first, : “Generally, Persian history is said to have begun with King Cyrus the Great, who unified Persia and conquered vast tracts of land. He is also famous for liberating the Jews from captivity in Babylon around 538 BC, as is amply recorded in the Bible, in the Books of Isaiah, Daniel and Ezra. “ But how could they liberate the Jews, a Semetic peoples, if the Semites weren’t here first? And you DO say the Arabs are Semites.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.