To: oldbrowser
Let me guess: those votes by nonexistent people were Democratic votes, right. Whenever the papers find actual, specific instances of voter fraud, they never mention who the fraudulent votes were for. And, on the other hand, when there is a made-up example of fraud: IE: people of certain ethnic minorities "disenfranchised" for (Gasp) not having filled things out correctly, it's all the Republicans' fault.
BTW: how in hell does having to present an ID and thereby proving who you are discriminate against minorities and the disabled? They throw out these blanket statements: "Hey that's discriminatory," but no one dares ask them as to HOW it's discriminatory!
Weren't there about 1,800 more democratic votes in King County Washington that voters in the entire county?
7 posted on
02/09/2005 7:14:20 AM PST by
NavyDoc
To: NavyDoc
Sorry for the double post guys. I haven't had my coffee yet!
;-)
8 posted on
02/09/2005 7:15:07 AM PST by
NavyDoc
To: NavyDoc
"Hey that's discriminatory," but no one dares ask them as to HOW it's discriminatory! Their theory is that all minorities are more illiterate and less likely to have proper documentation and therefore more likely to be turned away at the voting booth. Hey that sounds like the Democrats are being prejudiced in their views.
25 posted on
02/09/2005 7:28:39 AM PST by
oldbrowser
(Liberalism is the condition of children and barbarians)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson