Posted on 02/09/2005 7:17:23 AM PST by SJackson
One rogue state at a time.
As long as the "Indio-facists" don't have WMD, they can wait awhile.
Weren't the Indians of Paraguay the storm troops for Stroessner's regime? Wonder what the Left has to say about that?
Francis Parker Yockey (yimach shemo vezikhro!) was a man ahead of his time. Yockey was an extreme anti-Semite and pro-Nazi who wrote the national socialist classic Imperium and was apparently an ideological godfather of Willis Carto (yimach shemo vezikhro!). However, unlike so many "patriotic" anti-Semites, Yockey was avowedly anti-American and wholeheartedly welcomed Communist anti-Zionism as an ally in the Fifties. He also (unlike most "white nationalists") insisted that whites had no business in the Western Hemisphere, so far away from their "roots" and their "homeland."
Jews and white Americans have become the universal targets of a bizarre (though increasingly less so) and absurd doctrine of autochthony/indigenousness that holds that everyone but these two groups grows naturally and organically out of its native soil. Jews and white Americans are the "weeds" that are allegedly preventing some sort of deep ecological paradise.
Inca dink a dink.
Well, there's nipping it in the bud, and there's also acting while there still is a state to represent. Internationally, it's much easier to justify war against terrorists that against a terrorist-created state.
Color-coded human sacrifice ping.
Inca dink a do... LoL...
Best we focus upon those in our own hemisphere. The perils are far more serious than we realize, especially with an influx of over a million illegals annually into the US.
As long as the "Indio-facists" don't have WMD, they can wait awhile.
Apparently you don't know about what Mr. Lula is up to in Brazil.
I gotta million of em.
Correct. They also have ties to the white deep ecologists of North America who are funded by globalist corporate wealth (the money is usually laundered by a chain of middlemen, starting with the likes of the Tides Foundation). Consider VHEMT, the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement or the Church of Euthanasia.
Lula DeSilva in Brazil is working on them. China and Russia might even be assisting him.
Jews and white Americans have become the universal targets of a bizarre (though increasingly less so) and absurd doctrine of autochthony/indigenousness that holds that everyone but these two groups grows naturally and organically out of its native soil. Jews and white Americans are the "weeds" that are allegedly preventing some sort of deep ecological paradise.
Correct. They also have ties to the white deep ecologists of North America who are funded by globalist corporate wealth (the money is usually laundered by a chain of middlemen, starting with the likes of the Tides Foundation). Consider VHEMT, the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement or the Church of Euthanasia.
So, since I'm sure these people don't advocate the extinction of "indigenous pipples," does that mean they don't classify them as human?
Since these global corporate elites aren't made up of "indigenous pipples," are the elitists going to die out with all the other non-Irish white people? Or are they going to be the exception?
And here's a blast from the past by yours truly.
Karl Marx has become the successor of J*sus as the figure inculturated by the most mystical nationalist movements around the world.
In fact, these nutjobs regard ALL humans as worthy of extermination, including IPs. They say they don't start with themselves because they are working for a worthy cause, but promise to be right behind the rest of us. Interestingly, what they would accomplish is to kill those who supposedly care about the planet and leaving it to those who don't give a crap. It's a truly bizarro philosophy, about which I have written extensively.
Since these global corporate elites aren't made up of "indigenous pipples," are the elitists going to die out with all the other non-Irish white people? Or are they going to be the exception?
Well, they do think that they are exceptional, don't they?
This whole indigenous population deciding that they had a superior culture before they came in contact with the west reminds me exactly of Pol Pot's ideology. Pol Pot thought that if he could just eliminate all the remanents of westerism including people who spoke foreign languages or wore glasses that Cambodia would return to a deep ecology Ankor Watt wonderland.
If these people are successful they'll just wind up utterly destroying their country, and needlessly exterminating the intelligent educated 1/3 of the population of their country out of mentally ill levels of paranoia.
They will eventually start a war with a neighboring country and be utterly vanquished. Then their country will languish as a pathetic backwater for generations.
I am sure the deep ecologists would be just tickled pink with this outcome and will show their support for the "people's liberation" and against any sort of Imperialist manuever.
BTW, I have met deep ecologists before who really truly and honestly believe that war is good because it eliminates useless population.
"Since these global corporate elites aren't made up of "indigenous pipples," are the elitists going to die out with all the other non-Irish white people? Or are they going to be the exception?"
No, no! The global corporate and eco-elites think that the indigenous pipples, being in a pure and innocent pre-fall state couldn't possibly run the world on their own. They need guidence from a strong, benevolent hand to build a lasting utopia. In other words "we want these idiots to be our slaves".
The thing is, since Marxism is sort of the ultimate Western philosophy, can such movements be considered "Marxist" at all? Or at least, how do they themselves link this primitive pre-Westernism with the 19th century Prussian intellectual? Ironically, Marx referred to "the idiocies of rural life" and called for the abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equitable distribution of the population (that's in the Manifesto). In fact, some Leftists have actually begun pointing out the German rightwing origins of the ecology movement (the political movement, not the actual science). Wasn't Marxism supposed to be about industrial socialism by an international working class?
If the Japanese militarists had arisen today instead of back in the Thirties and Forties, would they have called themselves "rightwingers" or "anti-Communists," or do you suppose they would have jumped onto the mystical nationalist "Marxist" bandwagon???
Definately worth a read if curious about the scary state of Latin America today.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.