[EternalVigilance]

The Times’ story got as far as it did mainly because a respected NASA scientist had produced enhanced photographic evidence that the president was wearing something -- a bulletproof vest, electronic device, or back brace, no one could say.

Humph!

I did a scientific study of Kerry during the debates, and based on what came out of his mouth, can prove conclusively that NOTHING is in Kerry's head!

Real NASA scientists agree with me, too! Hey they saw the bunny pic stuff in real time!

MSM blew off that story, as well...and the evidence was overwhelming...

[Williams]

This is really silly. Lsst time I checked NASA does not specialize in determining that a person lied about whether a bulge in their shirt in a photo was a "something" or a wrinkle. I don't care if the bulge looked like a cheese sandwich with Jesus Christ appearing on it - as just one example - stuff often "looks" odd in a photo but NASA scientists cannot determine this. Really stupid stuff, the story being that the NYT even considered going with this.