Well, you sure seemed pretty sure that photo WAS of him. What proof do you have for that accusation?
If you disagree, maybe you have some you'd like to share with the group
So you can't repond without a personal attack?
I seemed pretty sure because the article seemed pretty sure. But you knew that. I've no inclination to google for photos of the Gannon-in-undies and Gannon-in-pressroom pics to compare, but you could if it's crucial to your case to show that I'm leaping to conclusions based on an MSM article. I doubt you'll find I'm leaping to conclusions about something so simply demonstrable, which is why I have some faith in the article.
As to your accusation I personally attacked you--how's that? I just said if you don't think an undie picture of yourself is exposure beyond what ought to be on the web, gosh, shouldn't be such a big deal to you to post a few. That's no personal attack, it's you putting your money where your mouth is.