Relief for Iranian 'Burning Hell'
Posted on 02/10/2005 3:29:43 PM PST by swilhelm73
TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran, facing mounting U.S. pressure over its nuclear program, promised Thursday a "burning hell" for any aggressor as tens of thousands marched to mark the 26th anniversary of its Islamic revolution.
"The Iranian nation does not seek war, does not seek violence and dispute. But the world must know that this nation will not tolerate any invasion," President Mohammad Khatami (news - web sites) said in a fiery speech to the crowd in central Tehran.
"The whole Iranian nation is united against any threat or attack. If the invaders reach Iran, the country will turn into a burning hell for them," he added, as the crowd, braving heavy snow, chanted "Death to America!" and "Death to Israel!."
Senior officials had called for a big turnout at the revolution anniversary parades to send a message to Washington which has toughened its stance on Iran in recent weeks.
President Bush (news - web sites) said Wednesday a nuclear-armed Iran would be "a very destabilizing force" and urged the West to work together to stop this happening.
"The Iranians just need to know that the free world is working together to send a very clear message: Don't develop a nuclear weapon," Bush said.
Unlike North Korea (news - web sites), which Thursday openly declared it has made nuclear arms, Iran denies U.S. accusations it is building bombs under cover of a civilian nuclear energy program.
But Iran, too, has hardened its language in recent days, refusing to contemplate scrapping sensitive activities like uranium enrichment -- which can be used to make bomb-grade material -- and vowing to accelerate work on its program if the United States or Israel attacked its atomic plants.
HEADING FOR SECURITY COUNCIL?
Diplomats said while the chances of a U.S. or Israeli attack were slim, Iran appeared to be on a collision course with the U.N. Security Council, which could impose sanctions.
"It's hard to see how they can avoid going to the Council, unless they substantially change their position," said a Western diplomat in Tehran.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) said Wednesday Tehran must accept a deal being offered by the European Union (news - web sites) -- to scrap potentially weapons-related work like enrichment in return for trade deals and other incentives -- or be referred to the Security Council.
But Iran's top nuclear negotiator Hassan Rohani told Reuters in an interview this week there was nothing the West could offer Iran that would tempt it to give up its atomic fuel cycle.
Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani accused the EU and United States of colluding in an effort to force Iran to compromise.
"One side is playing a good cop role, while the other side is playing the bad cop in order to put Iran in the throes of the good cop from fear of the bad cop," the official IRNA news agency quoted him as saying.
There are also mixed voices coming from Iran. While most rhetoric this week has been hard line, a top nuclear negotiator Thursday signaled an opening for a deal at EU talks, which continue Friday, because of a perceived change in the European position.
"The chance of striking an agreement is not small because Iran is quite flexible in this regard," Hossein Mousavian, a senior official at Iran's Supreme National Security Council, told state television.
NEED TALKS TO CONTINUE
One European diplomat in Tehran said it was typical for Iran to turn up the heat of its rhetoric in the run-up to a round of talks with the EU and then soften its stance afterwards.
"It's typical posturing. At the end of the day they don't want to go to the Security Council so they need to continue the EU talks," the diplomat said.
Those at Thursday's annual demonstration, which tends to draw the hardcore supporters of Iran's clerical establishment, said Iran would not back down in the face of U.S. threats.
"The U.S. is after an excuse. If we stop atomic technology, they will find another excuse," said Habibollah Hosseini, a 68-year-old cleric.
"They invaded Iraq (news - web sites) although there were no weapons (of mass destruction). The best response to intimidation is unity and power. We are here to show this," he said.
Several carried effigies of Bush, one of which, carrying a banner which read "I love war" was burned.
It's not smart to threaten the world's only superpower.
I've heard this before. Where was it?
Is it hot in here, or is it just me?
Afghanistan, or Iraq. Take your pick.
I say we incite war between Iran and N. Korea. Both Problems solved, with the added bonus of sucking militants out of Iraq, so they can go kill N. Koreans instead.
Then We can send the French, Germans and the UN in in radiation suits to sort it out.
Brutal ?? Yes. But effective.
Did Saddam copyright 'the Mother of All Battles'?
"Iran Vows 'Burning Hell' for Any Aggressor"
Mmmmm..... toasty.
Relief for Iranian 'Burning Hell'
That must be where they serve the roasted livers.
Personally, I would prefer to see the Persian people decorate their lampposts with Mullahs.
Good to see that Baghdad Bob has a gig.
Prolly Vegas in the 70's.
'I'm just a hunka hunka burnin' hell'...
I HATE YOU VERY MUCH! LEAVE MY COUNTRY ALONE!
Burning HELL?NO,Iran,anything but THAT.We are REALLY scared now and will do whatever you and the mullahs wish!
OK, I'll say it, "Bring It On".
In a related article.
"The Iranian nation does not seek war, does not seek violence and dispute" ... "the crowd, braving heavy snow, chanted "Death to America!" and "Death to Israel!."
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.