But from where I sit, it seems as if he caved without a struggle. What if he'd been bolder, reported what a target he'd become, made the issue I'm suggesting THE issue, suggested that EVERY other reporter target EVERY other reporter with the sort of scruting he'd come under? What web sites are associated with David Gregory's (am I remembering that name right?) name? Where have his contributions gone? Is there a pattern in HIS questions? (We know there is.) Why is a radically left bias acceptable, but a right bias not?
THAT should have been made, and still can be made, THE issue.
In total agreement...