Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

January 2001 Memo Warned Bush of Al Qaeda Threat
Reuters ^ | 2/11/05 | JoAnne Allen

Posted on 02/11/2005 8:42:28 AM PST by pissant

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A newly released memo warned the White House at the start of the Bush administration that al Qaeda represented a threat throughout the Islamic world, a warning that critics said went unheeded by President Bush (news - web sites) until the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

The memo dated Jan. 25, 2001 -- five days after Bush took office -- was an essential feature of last year's hearings into intelligence failures before the attacks on New York and Washington. A copy of the document was posted on the National Security Archive Web site on Thursday.

The memo, from former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke to then-national security adviser Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites), had been described during the hearings but its full contents had not been disclosed.

Clarke, a holdover from the Clinton administration, had requested an immediate meeting of top national security officials as soon as possible after Bush took office to discuss combating al Qaeda. He described the network as a threat with broad reach.

"Al Qaeda affects centrally our policies on Pakistan, Afghanistan (news - web sites), Central Asia, North Africa and the GCC (Gulf Arab states). Leaders in Jordan and Saudi Arabia see al Qaeda as a direct threat to them," Clarke wrote. (snip) The memo also warned of overestimating the stability of moderate regional allies threatened by al Qaeda.

It recommended that the new administration urgently discuss the al Qaeda network, including the magnitude of the threat it posed and strategy for dealing with it.

The document was declassified on April 7, 2004, one day before Rice's testimony before the Sept. 11 commission. It was released recently by the National Security Council to the National Security Archive -- a private library of declassified U.S. documents obtained through the Freedom of Information Act.

(Excerpt) Read more at story.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 2001; alqaeda; bushknew; clintonswatch; commies; mediabias; nsa; nsamemo; oklahomacity; prequel; rice; richardclarke; somalia; terroristsfordems; twa800; usembassies; usscole
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
The MSM is going to recycle the "Bush Knew" crap again and again. WE MUST CRUSH THE TRAITOROUS MSM AND EXPOSE THEIR F***ING DISTORTIONS. Richard Clarke is a charlatan of the 1st order and Reuters is a pathetic collection of self-hating communists.
1 posted on 02/11/2005 8:42:28 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant

Where is the "Oh No Not this s*&t again" pic?


2 posted on 02/11/2005 8:44:07 AM PST by day10 (Rules cannot substitute for character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

This begs the question: Why didn't Clarke call for an immediate meeting with Clinton and Gore?


3 posted on 02/11/2005 8:44:21 AM PST by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Recycle is right. There's nothing new here.


4 posted on 02/11/2005 8:44:46 AM PST by Huck (I only type LOL when I'm really LOL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10

I don't believe this for a minute....more of the loony libs proganda....stupid idiots can't win, why don't they leave this country and let us live in peace.....


5 posted on 02/11/2005 8:45:18 AM PST by HarleyLady27 (Prayers ease the heavy burdens of the living....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Even if the White House had full knowledge of the attacks, only targeted "profiling" of passengers would have stopped the hijackers at the airport gates. Guess who is against "profiling"? Course the media will never point this out.


6 posted on 02/11/2005 8:45:22 AM PST by happyathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10

Didn't Bush not get into the white house till Feb.? Also, he was in the middle of the Dems. obstructing all of his cabinet picks.


7 posted on 02/11/2005 8:45:39 AM PST by Holicheese (This is Hockey East)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Let's see. AQ affects policies .... Other leaders see AQ as a threat ...

I missed the part where he said AQ was a threat to the US?


8 posted on 02/11/2005 8:45:51 AM PST by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10

Is this like saying : "We will attack somewhere in the world" and now it's Bush's fault?
Move along, nothing to see here.


9 posted on 02/11/2005 8:45:59 AM PST by americanbychoice2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

January 2001 Memo Warned Bush of Al Qaeda Threat

Was this memo by any chance found near a Texas Kinko's?
10 posted on 02/11/2005 8:46:38 AM PST by COBOL2Java (If this isn't the End Times it certainly is a reasonable facsimile...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

Good point...


11 posted on 02/11/2005 8:46:41 AM PST by March I up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

This article mentions twice that the threats were for overseas, not on U.S. soil.


12 posted on 02/11/2005 8:47:01 AM PST by KJC1 (Liberals are to America what undertows are to swimmers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
al Qaeda represented a threat

Didn't everyone know this after the first WTC bombing in 1993?

13 posted on 02/11/2005 8:47:08 AM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

This article is totaly misleading. The only thing it sates is that al Qaeda represented a threat throughout the Islamic world. We already knew that. Where does it mention anything about airlines being used as missles? What a load of recycled crap


14 posted on 02/11/2005 8:47:08 AM PST by slowhand520
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: day10

15 posted on 02/11/2005 8:47:44 AM PST by Recovering Hermit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The memo dated Jan. 25, 2001 -- five days after Bush took office --

And what was in that memo that couln't have been in any memo Clarke wrote after the US Embassy bombings in Africa in 1998? The Clinton administration had its whole administration to deal with terrorism and it didn't. The first WTC bombing occurred just six weeks after Clinton took office. The Embassy bombings happened about 2 1/2 years before he left office.

16 posted on 02/11/2005 8:47:45 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
This will be hugh; Richard Clark has all the qualities of a dog except loyalty.
17 posted on 02/11/2005 8:48:10 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Here we go again. SOS! The MSM is the laziest bunch of a-holes taking space up on the planet known to man.


18 posted on 02/11/2005 8:48:46 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
A newly released memo warned the White House at the start of the Bush administration that al Qaeda represented a threat throughout the Islamic world,

I didn't know the Twin Towers were part of the Islamic world.

The media is despicable in its attempts to smear the President.

Regards, Ivan

19 posted on 02/11/2005 8:49:12 AM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


20 posted on 02/11/2005 8:51:00 AM PST by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson