Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush team tried to suppress pre-9/11 report (ZOT!!! Help, I'm bein' suppressed!)
Belfast Telegraph ^ | 11 February 2005

Posted on 02/11/2005 10:11:56 AM PST by Charles Riggs

Federal officials were repeatedly warned in the months before the 11 September 2001 terror attacks that Osama bin Laden and al-Qa'ida were planning aircraft hijackings and suicide attacks, according to a new report that the Bush administration has been suppressing.

Critics say the new information undermines the government's claim that intelligence about al-Qa'ida's ambitions was "historical" in nature.

The independent commission investigating the attacks on New York and Washington concluded that while officials at the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) did receive warnings, they were "lulled into a false sense of security". As a result, "intelligence that indicated a real and growing threat leading up to 9/11 did not stimulate significant increases in security procedures".

The report, withheld from the public for months, says the FAA was primarily focused on the likelihood of an incident overseas. However, in spring 2001, it warned US airports that if "the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, a domestic hijacking would probably be preferable".

Kristin Bretweiser, whose husband was killed in the World Trade Centre, said yesterday the newly released details undermined testimony from Condoleezza Rice, the former national security adviser, who told the commission that information about al-Qa'ida's threats seen by the administration was "historical in nature".

She told The Independent: "There were 52 threats that were mentioned. These were present threats - they were not historical. There were steps that could have been taken. Marshals could have been put on planes that spring. Condoleezza Rice's testimony is undermined." To the consternation of members of the commission who published the original report last year, the administration has been blocking the release of the latest information. An unclassified copy of this additional appendix was passed to the National Archives two weeks ago with large portions blacked out.

The latest pages note that of the FAA's 105 daily intelligence summaries between 1 April 2001 and 10 September 2001, 52 of them mentioned Osama bin Laden, al-Qa'ida, or both. The report also concludes that officials did not expand the use of in-flight air marshals or tighten airport screening for weapons. It said FAA officials were more concerned with reducing airline congestion, lessening delays and easing air carriers' financial problems than thwarting a terrorist attack.

Laura Brown, a spokeswoman for the FAA, said the agency received intelligence from other agencies, which it passed on to airlines and airports. "[But] we had no specific information about means or methods that would have enabled us to tailor any countermeasures," she said. "We were spending $100m a year to deploy explosive detection equipment."

The commission's report, issued last summer, detailed missed opportunities that, had law enforcement agencies acted differently, may have provided a chance to prevent the attacks. It also listed recommendations to prevent further attacks. It said the administrations of George Bush and Bill Clinton could have done more to stand up to al-Qa'ida.

But the details, first obtained by The New York Times, are the strongest evidence yet of the widespread warnings and officials' failure to take action. They also support claims by whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, a former FBI translator, who said she saw evidence that showed officials were aware of the al-Qa'ida threat before 9/11.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; faa; hateamericafilth; kristinbretweiser; nsamemo; prequel; zotbait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

1 posted on 02/11/2005 10:11:57 AM PST by Charles Riggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Charles Riggs
Kristin Bretweiser back from holiday on the Riviera...
2 posted on 02/11/2005 10:14:53 AM PST by WoodstockCat (W2 !!! Four more Years!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Riggs

Bye bye.


3 posted on 02/11/2005 10:15:20 AM PST by Sloth (I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoodstockCat; Mo1; StarFan

She'll no doubt be on with Matthews soon.


4 posted on 02/11/2005 10:16:19 AM PST by Howlin (It's a great day to be an American -- and a Bush Republican!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WoodstockCat

The press calls Kristin Breitweiser and her fellow commies "the Jersey Girls." I call them the 'terror whores.'


5 posted on 02/11/2005 10:16:45 AM PST by Sloth (I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WoodstockCat

Funny how no one is having kittens about a politicized figure like Kristin Bretweiser having access to a classified report.


6 posted on 02/11/2005 10:16:54 AM PST by dirtboy (Funny how liberals are suddenly concerned about someone's sex life. Where were they in 1998?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Charles Riggs

Welcome to FR!

I have a feeling it will be a short visit.


7 posted on 02/11/2005 10:17:04 AM PST by beltfed308
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Riggs; MEG33; dubyaismypresident; 4mycountry; Pan_Yans Wife; Charlie OK; E Rocc; dirtboy; ..
Calling Viking Kittens to the attack.

8 posted on 02/11/2005 10:17:36 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 ("I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for," - Howard Dean 01/29/2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Riggs
Welcome to FR.

Sooooooooo, whaddaya think of all that?

9 posted on 02/11/2005 10:17:50 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Riggs

The Belfast Telegraph dug this story up all by themselves?

Just breaking in the Moldovia Gazette:

Tereeeeza Threatened To Slam Private Plane Into WTC!


10 posted on 02/11/2005 10:17:50 AM PST by KidGlock (W-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Riggs

Welcome to FR? sniff


11 posted on 02/11/2005 10:18:13 AM PST by JimWforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beltfed308

The head of the FAA was a Dukakis hack.


12 posted on 02/11/2005 10:18:16 AM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Charles Riggs

What bull. The entire point Bush, Condi et al was making was that any warnings of attacks were tenuous. Hundreds of warnings, tips, signals whatever are received every day. None of the warnings have a date/time and you can't drop everything unless there is something more specific.

Hindsight is always 20/20.


13 posted on 02/11/2005 10:18:40 AM PST by Trippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

And no doubt Chrissy will be drooling


14 posted on 02/11/2005 10:19:20 AM PST by Mo1 (Question to Liberals .. When did supporting and defending Freedom become a bad thing??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Howlin

I had to turn him off last evening. He had a panel on who refused to say that the president sat on this info because of the election. He kept screaming at them asking the same stupid question over and over.


16 posted on 02/11/2005 10:20:14 AM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Charles Riggs; MeekOneGOP

Buhbye Chuckie.


17 posted on 02/11/2005 10:20:29 AM PST by PilloryHillary (Can vegetarians eat animal crackers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

So, where are the Jersey Girls in their repudiation of Ward Churchill?!


18 posted on 02/11/2005 10:20:34 AM PST by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Charles Riggs

PIFFLE


19 posted on 02/11/2005 10:20:37 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Riggs
Hey... *poke, poke* You still awake?

You're supposed to comment on the articles you post. Do you agree with the slanderous crap you posted?

20 posted on 02/11/2005 10:21:11 AM PST by TChris (Most people's capability for inference is severely overestimated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson