Skip to comments.
Chávez arming to fight attack by U.S.
The Miami Herald ^
| Feb. 12, 2005
| Phil Gunson and Steven Dudley
Posted on 02/12/2005 7:28:32 AM PST by David1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: David1
No. That's a cover. He's arming to take over more land. Colombia, etc. IMO.
21
posted on
02/12/2005 7:48:52 AM PST
by
bvw
To: David1
"Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez has long been known for his harsh anti-Bush rhetoric. But now he's stepping up military plans and weapons purchases to match his combative tone, and he is worrying U.S. policymakers."
Jimmy Carter is probably waving his pom-poms with glee.
22
posted on
02/12/2005 7:49:14 AM PST
by
rollo tomasi
(Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
To: David1
Assuming (a very dubious assumption) that UGO THE MAGNIFICENT was actually elected even once, Venezuela is an ongoing story of why freedom is far more important than mere democracy and must take precedence.
We ought not to tolerate his continued wasting of oxygen.
For Venezuelans, slavery is when UGO takes control of your country; hope is when the US takes note of what this communist punk is up to; and freedom is when he is thoroughly ventilated along with his top commissars and hanged by the ankles in the public square of Caracas for an appropriate outraging of the corpses. The sooner the better.
23
posted on
02/12/2005 7:51:10 AM PST
by
BlackElk
(Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
To: pangaea6
Isn't this same fella that Jimmy Carter embraced his election and had a lovefest with?It would have to be. Carter has a perfect record of supporting losers at the world leader level who systematically and thoroughly abuse their people whether intentionally and negligently.
Carter is the master of economic and social malaise. The one thing he cannot and will not tolerate is a cheerful, optimistic, prosperous, and self-reliant people.
24
posted on
02/12/2005 7:52:46 AM PST
by
JCEccles
To: kingsurfer
Right -- the Somoza regime was no picnic. It was said that, in essence, five bigshot families controlled or owned most of the country and decided its fortunes. So, out of the frying pan (which was fairly local and contained), into the fire (which made it instantly a threat of the first magnitude, the international communist conspiracy -- a direct threat to the US -- that is, until that scheme came apart at the seams in 1989-90).
25
posted on
02/12/2005 7:52:59 AM PST
by
Migraine
To: David1
Another Castro. Perfect! END SARCASM!
To: David1
My guess: He wants to attack Colombia and/or Guyana because Venezuela has territorial disputes with both countries. Chavez is a rabid nationalist and populist. That's quite a brutal combination.
27
posted on
02/12/2005 7:53:15 AM PST
by
Kurt_D
To: Migraine
I hear they are relatively stable now with a semi-functioning democracy. Do you know it is or not?
I certainly hope so. If countries in Latin America can show that democracy means you can prosper then it would a great example.
To: David1
Brilliant implementation of the highly acclaimed North Korean model of governance.
To: jocon307
Once again, let us give thanks we live in the USA.
Amen. I've told my own children this a thousand times, and I tell my students that as well.
30
posted on
02/12/2005 7:58:26 AM PST
by
Clara Lou
(Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
To: Clara Lou
I think the same goes for most people living in the Western world. I mnea there are literally billions of people leaving in poverty or under dictatorship. We are all lucky to have the benefit of living in a free, prosperous, democratic society.
To: Clara Lou
"I've told my own children this a thousand times, and I tell my students that as well."
good on ya Clara Lou! keep telling them the TRUTH! It's amazing how many people won't.
32
posted on
02/12/2005 8:03:23 AM PST
by
jocon307
(Vote George Washington for the #1 spot)
To: David1
What do people in nordeste Brasil think about this cabron?
33
posted on
02/12/2005 8:09:04 AM PST
by
BobS
To: RFEngineer
And it's time for us to ratchet up the old Cold War. Ronald Reagan won the battle and instigated the demise of the Evil Empire, but will Jimmy Carter, Fidel Castro, Robert Mugabe, and Hugo Chavez win the war?
34
posted on
02/12/2005 8:14:30 AM PST
by
dufekin
(Saddam Hussein: both a TERRORIST and a COMMUNIST, deposed thank God and the American soldier!)
To: conservativecorner
There's only one way to deal with an idiot like this one, and that is to cut him off at his knees. Blockade all oil exports coming out of his country, I know it would probably hurt us in the short term but the long term benefits would be tremendous. His whole house of cards would collapse overnight and he'd be just another self-deluded Socialist fool dumped upon the ashe heap of history.
35
posted on
02/12/2005 8:19:26 AM PST
by
Mr. C
(I'm game for another "Tea Party" ... How about you?)
To: pangaea6
...but Chávez has won two democratic elections and fended off a recall referendum just last year. Those elections were as democratic as Saddam's. As Stalin said, "It doesn't matter who votes. What matters is who counts the votes." When Carter blessed them we should have known this would be coming.
36
posted on
02/12/2005 8:21:58 AM PST
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
To: Migraine
". . . the Somoza regime was no picnic. It was said that, in essence, five bigshot families controlled or owned most of the country and decided its fortunes."Sounds like a more violent version of Mexico.
37
posted on
02/12/2005 8:22:01 AM PST
by
Oatka
To: David1
He later added that any attack on Cuba or Venezuela ``would be an attack on both.'' The Moonbat Doctrine
38
posted on
02/12/2005 8:23:34 AM PST
by
CaptRon
(Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
To: Oatka
To: kingsurfer
I hear they are relatively stable now with a semi-functioning democracy. Do you know it is or not? I certainly hope so. If countries in Latin America can show that democracy means you can prosper then it would a great example. They are relatively stable, having had three elections in which the Sandinistas were rebuffed every time. However, bear in mind that everything communism touches turns to fecal matter (and it doesn't take long). With that in mind, Nicaragua's meager progress economically is to be compared with that of, say, Albania, or maybe Bulgaria. They need to overcome two persistent mentalities among the populace: peasant and socialist. That is, they need a middle class. For that, massive education is the key. That, and time. They are still very poor and have the unseemly gaps between rich and poor that communism so often successfully exploits. I hope they make it. Unfortunately, just as progress seemed most promising, hurricane Mitch hammered them back into the dark ages in 1998.
40
posted on
02/12/2005 8:31:29 AM PST
by
Migraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson