Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UpHereEh
This kind of information has been available for decades, including graphic photos, so I don't think these would be a huge tool of revolution on this matter. Which does not mean they shouldn't be spread around, but they are only a form of scene-setting. The REAL changing of hearts and minds, I think, comes when a woman is engaged one-on-one in discussion with someone willing to give the full facts and realities of the procedure.

I didn't read the rest of the article but I wonder if the writer mentions what I jokingly said to a pro-choicer I debated on this matter, that abortion is wrong to perform on animals because it's not the animal's choice. (The response was more or less agreement, to which I responded "Funny how no animal chooses to get an abortion of its own free will in any case." Yes, I know animals don't have free will but I was arguing with one of those crunchy granola New Agey prochoicers whose apartment had a lot of candles lit.)

13 posted on 02/12/2005 10:18:51 AM PST by Darkwolf377 ("Drowning someone, I wouldn't have a part in that."--Teddy K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf377
crunchy granola New Agey prochoicers...

Great description!
15 posted on 02/12/2005 10:21:12 AM PST by UpHereEh (Standing with the U.S.Eh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson