Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NorCalRepub
put it this way without arguing the minutia.....Davis was bad, McClintock was good, Bustamante was bad, Arnold was in the middle and the most likely to win......I won't argue the finer points with you now......I'm having too much fun conversing with tolerant FR's here....I note your displeasure with Arnold......carry on

You seem to want to quickly label those whose opinions you do not share as being intolerant and to avoid giving support for your contentions. If state spending, property rights, and borrowing are minutia, what do you find to be relevant?

You said Arnold has made progress. I asked how. It's a simple question. I'm not reliving the election; Bustamante, Davis, and McClintock are not relevant to my question. I'm talking about from November 2003 forward.

In contrast, I cited examples that have pushed us further to the left, negative progress.

Why do you participate in a "discussion" forum, if you aren't willing to engage in discussion?

32 posted on 02/12/2005 4:57:57 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl

well you are intolerant........I did not dismiss your opinions at any point......at all...you are entitled to them...but following me around the posts and to keep hitting me on it seems to show me that you are not willing to let sleeping dogs lie.....why is this so important that you feel compelled to foist your opinions on me. I've moved on to other posts and blogs.....just let it go calcowgirl......what is your aim and what is your insecurity???


33 posted on 02/12/2005 5:02:46 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson