Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Lincoln Still Matters(Compares America's founding principles and challenges to Iraq's struggles)
The Claremont Institute ^ | February 11, 2005 | Thomas L. Krannawitter

Posted on 02/12/2005 9:48:06 PM PST by Stoat

Why Lincoln Still Matters

By Thomas L. Krannawitter

-----

America has been described as an ongoing experiment in self-government, an experiment that can and will fail if the American people ever lose sight of the principles upon which America was founded. The same challenge faces our democratic friends around the world, including those in Iraq who are bravely attempting to bring self-government to a region of the world where it has been little known.

The central principle of free government is the principle of equality. But many people today misunderstand or confuse this principle. It is not the leveling spirit of an administrative state that tries to make all people the same in their material possessions. It is, rather, the simple recognition that all human beings, whatever their differences in appearance, or talent, or education, all possess the same human nature, with a free will and reason to direct it. No man is so superior as to be a god among men, or so inferior as to be ruled over without his consent, the way we govern our pets without asking them first. In other words, every human being is equally human. And it is because we are all equally human that we are, by right, equally free.

In political terms, equality means that only government by consent is legitimate government. But equality also requires that the consent of the governed be directed toward the equal protection of the equal rights of all who live under the government, the minority no less than the majority. Combining consent with the equal protection of equal rights, or transforming popular government into good government, while easy in theory, turns out to be one of the most difficult and rare achievements in human history. No one has understood this better, and no one has confronted the problem more directly, than Abraham Lincoln.

Immediately after Lincoln's election in November 1860, some Southerners began a movement for secession from the Union. In Apostles of Disunion, historian Charles Dew reviews the speeches of "secession commissioners" as they traveled throughout the South during the winter of 1860-61, trying to persuade fellow Southerners to leave the Union. In this critical moment, with nothing less than the future of the United States and constitutional government at stake, the defense of secession had little to do with the old sectional squabbles over tariffs or banks. The turning of the tide toward disunion and civil war rested squarely on the question of race and slavery. Leroy Pope Walker, Alabama's commissioner dispatched to Tennessee, and later the first Confederate secretary of war, predicted that if the South did not secede immediately, everything it valued would be lost: "First our property," then "our liberties," and finally the greatest Southern treasure of all, "the sacred purity of our daughters" would be lost to "pollution and violation to gratify the lust of half-civilized Africans."

This is the ugly truth of the American South on the eve of the Civil War. No one reading the literature of the antebellum period can honestly deny that slavery and race were at the heart of the Southern resolve to make war on the Union rather than accept Lincoln's election. It is why, on the eve of the Civil War, Lincoln wrote to Confederate Vice President Alexander Stephens that "the only substantial difference between us" is that "you think slavery is right and ought to be extended; while we think it wrong and ought to be restricted."

When citizens of eleven states rejected his constitutional election as president and attempted to secede, Lincoln faced the awful choice of allowing the only union in history based on equality to crumble, or drawing blood to preserve it. In the midst of the Civil War, Lincoln penned his famous letter to Horace Greeley, stating that his first priority was saving the Union, not destroying slavery. But for Lincoln, saving the Union was tantamount to solving the problem of slavery: In a constitutional government where the principle of equality was safe, slavery was not. When he wrote to Greeley, Lincoln had already announced to his Cabinet his plan for the Emancipation Proclamation. The Union Lincoln was trying to save was a Union where slavery was about to be dealt a lethal blow. It is the essence of American tragedy that in order for a government of consent and equal rights to survive, civil war had to come, and many young men would give the last full measure of their devotion.

The story of Lincoln provides a window for us to see clearly the principles of freedom and the obligations they impose on those who would defend them. We should continue to remember Lincoln and discuss him, not to prattle on about the past, but to learn the immutable principles according to which free people govern themselves. In this decisive respect, we learn that Lincoln's fight is our fight as well.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abelincoln; civilwar; iraq; lincoln; presidents
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
About the Author:
 

Thomas L. Krannawitter

Thomas L. Krannawitter is Vice President of the Claremont Institute, and Visiting Instructor of Government at Claremont McKenna College. Dr. Krannawitter holds a Master's degree and a Ph.D. in political science from the Claremont Graduate University, where he wrote a dissertation on Abraham Lincoln. He has received graduate and research fellowships from the John M. Olin Foundation, the H.B. Earhart Foundation, Winston Churchill Society, Intercollegiate Studies Institute, Institute for Human Studies, and he was a Salvatori Fellow at the Heritage Foundation in 1998/99.

Dr. Krannawitter has been published in scholarly journals and newspapers, including Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy, Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, Houston Chronicle, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and Orange County Register, and he has made numerous appearances on national radio such as National Public Radio of Chicago, The Hugh Hewitt Show, and Warren Duffy's Live From L.A. Krannawitter has spoken widely before civic, political, educational, and religious organizations on the American Founding, constitutional jurisprudence, citizenship, and classical and modern political philosophy, and he has testified before the California legislature. He is Editor of a PBS website on George Washington, and recently he directed a civic education program for middle and high school teachers across the country.


1 posted on 02/12/2005 9:48:08 PM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Oh please. Lincoln was a good man but the Civil War was entirely unncessary. He isn't one of my hero's.


2 posted on 02/12/2005 10:19:12 PM PST by GeronL (--I'm thinking, I'm thinking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

You are so ADORABLE! Do stoats like to cuddle with human ladies, or do you confine your attention to lady stoatesses? Do stoats like their ears fondled and their heads petted? How did you learn to type so well with your cute little paws?


3 posted on 02/12/2005 10:22:43 PM PST by Capriole (the Luddite hypocritically clicking away on her computer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Oh please.

Well, at least you're using the word 'please' which appears to be beyond many people's abilities these days   :-)

Lincoln was a good man but the Civil War was entirely unncessary.

I suppose we could say that all wars are ultimately unnecessary then I guess.  This, however, opens up a very large can of worms which is / are irrelevant to the essay. 

 He isn't one of my hero's.

No one is suggesting that Lincoln or anyone else needs to be your hero.

4 posted on 02/12/2005 10:32:49 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; Stoat
"The Civil War was entirely unnecessary"? Tell that to African Americans.

Lincoln was, as his former enemy and then Secretary of War Stanton said upon Old Abe's deathbed: "There lies the greatest leader the world has ever known."
5 posted on 02/12/2005 10:42:33 PM PST by Californiajones ("The apprehension of beauty is the cure for apathy" - Thomas Aquinas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Californiajones
The north didn't treat African-Americans all that much better than the South. Oh and what about the thousands of blacks who also owned slaves?

What Lincoln did ended up giving the left the excuse and precedent they needed to have the Feds take over everything.

6 posted on 02/12/2005 10:45:58 PM PST by GeronL (I'm thinking, I'm thinking!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

If you like the history of Lincoln then you know a little something about John Brown.

On a PBS documentry I learned that as a young democrat, John Wilks Booth, who later shot and killed Lincoln, had snuck into the closed hanging of John Brown some years earlier.

PBS also had links to the word of the original song "John Brown's Body" which I recorded. It's up online if you want to listen to it.

After Julia Ward Howe heard northern soldiers singing the
original version of the song as they marched, she wrote her
own words to it's tune. Soon after, her version, was
published in the "Atlantic Monthly" as "The Battle Hymn of
the Republic."

I think the song it's self makes a statement about the Republican party.

If you want to download it and listen to it it's at:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0007N2QFW/002-0943539-6424030?v=glance

Being as you know the history of the time I think you'll find it interesting.


7 posted on 02/12/2005 11:04:20 PM PST by GloriaJane ("How Many Babies Are Crying In Heaven Tonight" http://music.download.com/gloriajane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Typical Yankee BS. The Civil War was never a civil war. A civil war is when groups fight over control over the same government. This was the South wanting to create it's own government. The North fought to "save the union" not to free the slaves. Slavery was under the US government for 80 years, so why was there not war fought to free them then? It was only when the South secessed when they talked of war. The war between the states violently destroyed the decentralized federal system of the Founders and opened a way for the vast centralized government of today. The Southern states had withdrawn from the Union by democratic process, the same process they had followed to join the Union initially. The war was unconstitutional but as they say the winners of war write the history.
8 posted on 02/12/2005 11:13:17 PM PST by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: libertarianben

As I've read, the Republican party was founded by abolitionists who wanted to end slavery because they believed that all men were born of God to be free and by Kansas land owners who wanted to end slavery because they believed in free trade. The first Republican to be elected President was Abraham Lincoln.


9 posted on 02/12/2005 11:20:39 PM PST by GloriaJane ("How Many Babies Are Crying In Heaven Tonight" http://music.download.com/gloriajane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GloriaJane

Don't believe everything you read.


10 posted on 02/12/2005 11:26:04 PM PST by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: libertarianben

In 1854, anti-slavery activists organized themselves into a new political party, the Republican party.


It's in all the encyclopedias. And the first Republican President to be elected was Abram Lincoln.


11 posted on 02/12/2005 11:35:55 PM PST by GloriaJane ("How Many Babies Are Crying In Heaven Tonight" http://music.download.com/gloriajane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GloriaJane

I know Lincoln was the first Republican president. I also know they were partly formed by abolitionist. I was saying just because they were anti-slave doesn't give them the right to lauch a unconstitution war against the South.


12 posted on 02/12/2005 11:50:21 PM PST by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: libertarianben

Besides the North doesn't have a history of treating black well either. You can read that in books as well.


13 posted on 02/12/2005 11:53:55 PM PST by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: libertarianben

As it turned out, it ended up being one of the most wonderful things that ever happened to this country. IMHO

Freeing thousands from the bonds of human slavery is a wonderful thing! :)


14 posted on 02/12/2005 11:55:30 PM PST by GloriaJane ("How Many Babies Are Crying In Heaven Tonight" http://music.download.com/gloriajane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: libertarianben

Yes, sadly there are racists everywhere. It will be a blessid day on this earth when that no longer exists! : )


15 posted on 02/12/2005 11:58:05 PM PST by GloriaJane ("How Many Babies Are Crying In Heaven Tonight" http://music.download.com/gloriajane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

In one sense the war was unnecessary. Research has confirmed what I have never doubted: a fraction of the material cost of the war would have been enough to buy the freedom of every slave in the United States. Lincoln proposed exactly this, but it seems that almost nobody else was interested, North or South.


16 posted on 02/13/2005 2:47:01 AM PST by Christopher Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
The north didn't treat African-Americans all that much better than the South. Oh and what about the thousands of blacks who also owned slaves?

Neither of those points has any bearing on the rectitude of slavery as it existed at the time in question or the desirability of eliminating it or preventing its expansion.

17 posted on 02/13/2005 3:04:08 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Californiajones

Did he say that too? The more famous deathbed quote is "Now he belongs to the ages."


18 posted on 02/13/2005 4:59:08 AM PST by Molly Pitcher (We are Americans...the sons and daughters of liberty...*.from FReeper the Real fifi*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Christopher Lincoln

War was inevitable. If the South would have been allowed to leave the Union, there would have been ongoing border wars, innumerable disputes, grievances over commerce and trade. The longer the war was put off the more would have died when the war to end the issue finally took place. Lincoln was the Greatest President this nation ever had, followed by Washington, and then Reagan.


19 posted on 02/13/2005 5:08:18 AM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GloriaJane

The South would have ended slavery in time as well. Slavery was dying all over Europe. That's the only reason Britian and others did not help the south. Robert E. Lee was against slavery, he was fighting for his homeland. Lincoln set a horrible example by invading the south and making it be part of the Union. The old Soviet Union and others used Lincoln as reason to keep their territories from breaking away. US complained about that but it had no problem with Lincoln doing it.


20 posted on 02/13/2005 9:42:34 AM PST by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson