[ThePythonicCow]

This post turned out to be a false alar, Should have check it out first!

Wrong, twice over.

The parts about CODEX ALIMENTARIUS, WHO and WTO do not seem to be false alarms, as best as I can tell. See my several posts above.

And you got the wrong year in your research. These House and Senate bills, for the 108th Congress, were on the topic at hand:

• http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c108:1:./temp/~c108RnSsN5::

  Dietary Supplement Safety Act of 2003 (Introduced in Senate)
  

  S 722 IS

  108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

  S. 722

  To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to require that manufacturers of dietary supplements submit to the Food and Drug Administration reports on adverse experiences with dietary supplements, and for other purposes.

  IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

  March 26, 2003

  Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

• http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c108:2:./temp/~c108RnSsN5::

  Dietary Supplement Access and Awareness Act (Introduced in House)
  

  HR 3377 IH

  108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

  H. R. 3377

  To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to dietary supplements.

  IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

  October 28, 2003

  Mrs. DAVIS of California (for herself, Mr. WAXMAN, and Mr. DINGELL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

---

Next time, get your corrections straight, before you post them.

[ThePythonicCow]

Granted, these bills are old in any case. The 109th session of congress convened on January 4, 2005.

And so I suspect the article you initially posted is a bit confused, mixing news of early 2005 (about WHO, CODEX and WTO) with old warnings of last sessions bills.