No, the article wasn't biased at all. I'm sure that Keyes and his wife heartlessly kicked the deviant out of the house, into the street, and told her to never darken their straight Christian door ever again.
Or maybe, just maybe, it didn't quite happen like that. Have you considered that? Maybe, they said that they didn't approve of her behavior and that she could not engage in it in their house. As a gay "activist" I'm sure she got up in their faces about it and caused a great deal of contention in the household. Maybe they said that if you don't like our values and refuse to respect us and you reject the way your were raised, then maybe it would be beneficial for all if you found an apartment and stopped living off of our dime.
Now, all of a sudden, Keyes decides he can't tolerate his daughter's behavior in his house.
And, yes. I can fully believe that Keyes would kick a child out of the house and refuse to speak to her.
Gotta keep up that damned-to-hell image he's cultivated.
Why would a well-known and constant Keyes hater ever consider anything like that?
Why would I want to consider the possibility that he acted in a way other than that indicated by his well-known bad-tempered smug personality?