Posted on 02/14/2005 8:25:09 PM PST by Callahan
This is complete intellectual and moral dishonesty from the NY Times and the Homosexual Mafia. What the "radical" procedure proposed is simply Public Health 101, taught in the first week of a simple college course. Moron college freshmen in health sciences majors therefore have more deep insights that the NY Times.
It was also the law, at least until the NY Times and the Homosexual Mafia legally coerced government to violate Public Health basic laws requiring disease tracking plus identification and isolation of vectors.
And so after murdering many millions of lives and utterly wasting untold billions of health care dollars, we have "a radical idea, born of desperation."
I cannot think of a more massive example of Liberalism, and why the democrat party must be destroyed.
Because they only show you what will make them appear righteous.
And your comment about Jews is incorrect, misleading, and quite unfair. But, you are quite consistent in that regard, so I'm unsurprised.
Let's be more precise: I'm against the first imperative of Kant, and very specifically his comments about the 'Law of Reason' - in effect, it is just another idol, just another version of Baal.
When legalists march against grace, the jack boots of history predict the endpoint. Though you don't see it now, chances are pretty good the future history will bear this out .... again. And we'll both argue about who is really to blame.
Because they only show you what will make them appear righteous.
Really... And why would they do that?
And your comment about Jews is incorrect, misleading, and quite unfair.
Not at all. You claimed:
In short, without Christ, a man will screw himself, his brother, and his sister, b/c it his nature.These are your words, not mine. Clearly you said that a belief in Christ was necessary for the kind of morality you were talking about, and that without it, "a man will screw himself, his brother, and his sister, b/c it his nature".
Jews are "without Christ", so clearly you hold this opinion about Jews. Or would you perhaps care to admit that your statement was in error?
But, you are quite consistent in that regard, so I'm unsurprised.
Indeed, I am quite consistent in pointing out the logical errors in your prejudices.
It's all Ronald Reagan's fault! He allowed AIDS to be spread to kill off all the gays (even though he had many gay, Hollywood friends).
Homosexuality is a mental illness and self destructive... don't belive the PC crap. Just go watch the documentary about the making of the Hepatitis vaccine and you will see the disgusting truth about this "lifestyle".
It is not untypical for these folks to have 10 to 20 different partners a night 7 nights a week... Do not remotely think that these people are just normal folks... they are largely mentally ill and engaging in horriffically self destructive behavior.
He and others said it would be more effective to try to identify the underlying causes of drug abuse and self-destructive behavior, including the difficulty of living in a society that rejects committed gay relationships while condemning homosexuals for having sex outside those relationships. Gay men, he said, are using methamphetamine as an antidepressant.
Uh, try the following TRUTH... Instead of the lies offered by a man blinded by his own depravity...
"In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion."
Well you made might point so I am not sure what I said that was incorrect. Mans nature is sin, it is a battle of the flesh and spirit. If men just feed their flesh and have no regard for the feeding of the spirit you have total hedonism.
My point is that mans nature is to have variety it is not so much with females. To prove this point look at lesbian relationships vs gay men. Lesbians tend to be monogamous for longer periods of time while gay men can have thousands of sexual partners in their life times.
Another example, men can easily have sex with a woman without caring if they know their name or not. Few women would consider such...
Oh horse sh#t. They are using it as a stimulant to increase their already hypersexual behavior. One damn excuse after another. Maybe at some point the psychiatrists will finally admit they were wrong in removing homosexuality from the diagnostic manual as an illness, something they did out of political correctness.
Agreed. Your observation is spot on.
Is sexual addiction or sexual obsession (any such term as that) on the DSM?
That's because they read Romans chapter one but failed to read Romans chapter 2. Certainly humanity is capable of all manner of evil but, as Romans 2 vs 14 and 15 says (Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law, since they show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts now accusing, now even defending them.) Humanity is also capable of performing much good - even without God as their objective.
"Many health experts suggest a more vigorous return to conventional H.I.V. prevention. Isaac Weisfuse, the city's deputy commissioner of health, said his agency was planning to place information banners on gay Web sites and devote more money to hard-hitting ads about methamphetamine use."
Great idea. It didn't work before, but what the hell, try it again. The Ad agencies could use the business and anyway, it's all just tax dollars from the breeders.
"...gays lose themselves in self-destructive mindless hedonism to drown out the pain of being rejected by society... "
A common rationalization, but as you imply, largely BS.
It has been used variously for alcoholism, drug addiction, suicide, "the suffering of the artist," all manner of dysfunctional aggression.
It is a function of narcissistic rage and the sexualization of the aggressive drive. It is a sado-masochistic tango more akin to ritualistic forcible rape than to heterosexual intercourse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.