sorry for the langauge, but i just wanted to point out the wholesome values of the site sean hanity says 'represents all that is great about this country"
These people feel so emboldened that they don't even try to hide their bigotry any more-even under the thin veil of "defending tradfition"
here's the homophobic line, posted by wideawake - who tags his name w/ (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief):
"David Brock and Andrew Sullivan exist for one purpose: to remind real conservatives that there is no such thing as a conservative faggot."
How is that "homophobic"?? I see no fear of faggotdom in that line, simply a statement of fact. Is "faggot' somehow a "bad word" now? Faggots call each other faggots all the time. Somehow this DUmmie finds God blessing our troops and Commander in Chief offensive. At least this one isn't concealing his bigotry. It seems this DUmmie also believes that saying what is obvious and truthful is somehow "bigotry". This DUmmie needs to look up the definition of "homophobic" and "bigot". It seems to me that he is his own worst enemy.
It has not so much to do with truth or bigotry, and more to do with decorum. DU is a site for bitter, crude losers, with very twisted and juvenile views of economics, social issues, and life in general. The F-word doesn't get deleted by moderators, but is instead celebrated as some sort of liberating liturgy. No profanity or epithet is too vile for inclusion in their discourse.
Use of the term “faggot” on this forum expresses a similar childish hostility that reflects poorly on the whole FR team. It brings us ever so slightly closer to the completely despicable social misfits that populate lefty sites like DU. It also gives them oxygen in their attempts to paint all on the right as bigots, fairly or not. Those that use the term and similar slurs only hurt the causes they attempt to further. They also reveal themselves as somewhat shallow and unable debate homosexual issues rationally. You get the impression that the person yelling “faggot” possibly has a secret; or at least hasn't cracked a book since "Cat In The Hat".