Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Quote:

Mr Ireland admits that British bloggers have not made the same impact as their American peers but says that the gap between the two groups is closing. He believes that this year's general election is likely to accelerate the process.

My experience with Brits on the Internet leads me to believe this has more to do with the nature of the audience than with the bloggers.

Most Brits just don't seem that interested in politics, and those who do use the 'Net do so for amusement and/or companionship more than for information-gathering.

It's as though they use their computers as a sort of cyber pub where they can get together with their mates for a bit of a chinwag and some good-natured — and npt-so-good-natured — piss-taking.

1 posted on 02/15/2005 1:31:57 PM PST by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: quidnunc
They need to be deputized.


2 posted on 02/15/2005 1:33:14 PM PST by My2Cents ("Friends stab you from the front." -- Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Which is why I no longer go to either the British, Irish, New Zealand, etc. etc. etc. All they talk about are drugs and sex. Nothing else.

To try and get anyone to talk about politics is like pulling hen's teeth.....ain't gonna happen.

5 posted on 02/15/2005 1:39:04 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

is it really scalps bloggers are after, or just shaking the puzzle box until all the pieces fall together?


7 posted on 02/15/2005 1:42:07 PM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

My experience of a year living in Britian is that Brits are far less caring about politics. Most grumble about the Labour Party but then end up voting for them anyway once they get in. Their attitude generally is that the two parties are so similar that it doesn't matter.

They've also seen to taken the big government excuses as facts. "If we had lower taxes, poor people would go hungry." "We have high gas taxes but it helps people from driving too much and contributing to global warming."


10 posted on 02/15/2005 1:52:57 PM PST by Barney Gumble (http://purveyors-of-truth.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
Have to agree about Brits not using the 'net the same way. I also think it's partly economic, dial-up access in most of the UK is local access number like the States, except most the damn British phones companies don't have local area free calling. So, if you're paying 3 pence a minute to use the 'net, most Brits won't spend their time maddening themselves over British politics?

And the UK blog roll from Fistful of Euros:

The Isles


12 posted on 02/15/2005 2:50:49 PM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc
The subsequent probe by the channel, triggered by blog reports, led to the departure of four high-level executives from the network.

Gee, really? I wasn't aware they'd left yet...

13 posted on 02/15/2005 2:52:19 PM PST by mewzilla (Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc; MadIvan
Unlike their American peers, British bloggers are yet to take a major political scalp

Y'all are slacking over there.

22 posted on 02/15/2005 7:12:20 PM PST by bad company (There can be no freedom without right and wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Guess they don't talk much about religion, either?


27 posted on 02/15/2005 8:47:23 PM PST by Ciexyz (I use the term Blue Cities, not Blue States. PA is red except for Philly, Pgh & Erie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Do we really need a war between British and US conservatives?

I was going to comment more specifically, but the ramblings are just so far fetched that I wouldn't know where to start.

British and American conservatives have to a degree parted company. Our priorities are now quite different.

In Britain, we have some special priorities:

the sovereignty of our nation has been compromised and is further threatened;

our traditions and institutions are threatened;

our Conservative Party has been in opposition for many years;

immigration is uncontrolled;

we are seeing the advent of a police state; and

we are still threatened by the IRA.

There are some odd conflicts of interest at FreeRepublic. Some Freepers are supporting NORAID whilst otherwise preaching a "war on terrorism". I mailed the moderator about that and received no comment. How can a US Conservative board post a press release from a terrorist organisation and let it stand?

I'm also perplexed by the suggest at FreeRepublic that the Brits are very racists whereas the Yanks are not. That represents an interesting position when shown on a continuum: if the British are totally racist and the Yanks are totally non-racist, who sits in between?

Fortunately, outside Freeperland a large amount of goodwill exists between our two nations. And conservatives across national boundaries should work together.

http://www.sterlingtimes.com/


50 posted on 02/19/2005 2:16:33 AM PST by Sterlingtimes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Bump


66 posted on 02/19/2005 11:21:26 AM PST by BunnySlippers (When it comes to humility, I'm the greatest! - Bullwinkle J. Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson