Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry Backs Bush's $81.9 Bln War Spending Plan
Reuters ^ | Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:43 PM ET

Posted on 02/15/2005 2:16:27 PM PST by redlenses

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic Sen. John Kerry, whose baffling explanation of votes on Iraq war funding hurt his 2004 White House bid, said on Tuesday he would back President Bush's new $81.9 billion request for Iraq and Afghanistan.

"I think we're in a very different situation," Kerry told reporters. "I'm going to vote for this ... I think this money is important to our being successful and to the completion of the process."

The Massachusetts senator, who failed in his bid to unseat Bush last November in an election focused on national security, defended his decision to not back the president's previous request to fund military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"Mine was the right vote at the time and I wouldn't change it if we went back to that point in time because it was the right vote," Kerry said. "We didn't have a plan and they didn't spend the money correctly."

In October 2003, a year after voting to support the use of force in Iraq, Kerry voted against an $87 billion supplemental funding bill for U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. He did support an unsuccessful alternative bill that funded the $87 billion by cutting some of Bush's tax cuts.

In March last year as the presidential campaign heated up, Kerry provided his Republican opponents with political ammunition when he sought to explain the move by saying: "I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it."

"Should we have done a better job, could I have done a better job personally in fighting back on defining that?" Kerry asked. "The answer is yeah."

Kerry said the United States would have made better progress on Iraq, where an insurgency continues to rage almost two years after the March 2003 invasion, if he had been elected. He asserted the Bush administration was only now "trying some of the things" he proposed such as focusing on training Iraqi forces and getting other countries involved.

"I think my security proposals for the country were smack on, dead on," Kerry said.

Bush's request is expected to be approved by lawmakers despite concerns in the U.S. Congress about record federal budget deficits.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: diefortheun; foreignleaders; globaltest; ichabodcrane; ihaveaplan; iraq; kerry; kerryiraq; kerryisaschmuck; lurch; lyingtraitor; magichat; militaryfunding; rapedcutoffears; signthe180; terazasgigolo; whalepoop
This just keeps getting better, doesn't it?
1 posted on 02/15/2005 2:16:27 PM PST by redlenses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: redlenses

Give him 5 minutes. He'll change his mind :)

2 posted on 02/15/2005 2:18:08 PM PST by mewzilla (Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan

my head is spinning


3 posted on 02/15/2005 2:18:30 PM PST by marblehead17 (I love it when a plan comes together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

Who is this Kerry fellow and why does he look so French?


4 posted on 02/15/2005 2:21:01 PM PST by AngryJawa (230 Grains of Happy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marblehead17

Kerry's statement--- "I support the President's funding request, that is before a while back when I do not support the effort to remove funding and support our troops, but I do not support the effort to raise funding to not support our troops, while before that, I do support funding that was not supported by my previous vote to stop and start funding last week, which has no bearing on my not funding the support that was funded by the Senate which did change my support on the issue of taking funds away from the military to give to the non-supported funds which I voted for yesterday, but now changed back to the original funding which I voted for along with the effort to change funding and re-support the vote to change the Senate vote which I do support...now I can clarify that by saying I do not support the funding which I earlier voted against, er for, then changed back on Wednesday, but....."


5 posted on 02/15/2005 2:22:21 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

Well, he can still be for it, before he votes against it.


6 posted on 02/15/2005 2:22:54 PM PST by TomGuy (America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlenses
So, let's see...he voted for the 80 bln before he voted against the 80 bln before he voted, um, for, or, against, I mean, um,....

7 posted on 02/15/2005 2:27:04 PM PST by bigdblogman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

LOL


8 posted on 02/15/2005 2:27:58 PM PST by marblehead17 (I love it when a plan comes together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

This President stole my plan...a plan I formulated while in Vietnam.


9 posted on 02/15/2005 2:30:13 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (The 80s belonged to the Gipper, the Aughts belong to Dubya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

when Kerry and Gore finally meld into one, will that be the first example of a fusion reaction emitting BS on implosion instead of gamma rays......


10 posted on 02/15/2005 2:30:25 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

Doesn't Bush realize how many lobsters that kind of money could save?
Geez.


11 posted on 02/15/2005 2:31:40 PM PST by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Wouldn't it be simpler and easier on everyone if instead of being "for", then "against", then again "for", he would just average his position(s) and be steadily FOR half the amount?


12 posted on 02/15/2005 2:32:18 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

That's assuming he can do simple math :)


13 posted on 02/15/2005 2:33:08 PM PST by mewzilla (Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Doing math is beneath his dignity, and is an affront to it. But, OTOH, he has valets, er, staffers to do it.
14 posted on 02/15/2005 2:35:08 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: redlenses
"Kerry Backs Bush's $81.9 Bln War Spending Plan"

That's this week. Alot can change in 7 days.

15 posted on 02/15/2005 2:35:19 PM PST by mass55th ("If I were two faced, would I be wearing this one?"----Abe Lincoln (1809-1865))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
But, OTOH, he has valets, er, staffers to do it.

Well, Terayzah does anyway. Jean Francois couldn't afford'em :)

16 posted on 02/15/2005 2:42:52 PM PST by mewzilla (Has CBS retracted the story yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

He's going to vote for it, before he votes against it.


17 posted on 02/15/2005 2:43:41 PM PST by chemicalman (Finally an answer for the prisoner problem at Abu Ghraib: Don't take any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

or simpler even still: Kerry is Forgainst everything!


18 posted on 02/15/2005 2:49:02 PM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: redlenses
Johhhhhhhhnnnnnn Boy!!!

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180

19 posted on 02/15/2005 2:58:39 PM PST by MarineBrat ("God is dead"- Nietzsche,1886. "Nietzsche is dead"- God,1901)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Har-har-har!!


20 posted on 02/15/2005 3:03:07 PM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: redlenses
Kerry told reporters. "I'm going to vote for this ... I think this money is important to our being successful and to the completion of the process."

So what now? Does Hillary! raise the ante by saying this isn't enough money?

21 posted on 02/15/2005 3:03:33 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclopean Squid
This President stole my plan...a plan I formulated while in Vietnam.

My plan, my plan ,I'm right, I'm right it was all my idea ....If it is going the right way today. Just wait tell tomorrow .

skerry is going to have to flip flop so many times before now and ,08 to be riight all the time , it should be a gas.

22 posted on 02/15/2005 3:28:16 PM PST by Deetes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Give him 5 minutes. He'll change his mind

I'll call some local sports books and see what the line is on how long before he....

before he..........

hahahahahahahahaha-hehehehehehehehehe.

What a schmuck.

LVM

23 posted on 02/15/2005 3:32:05 PM PST by LasVegasMac ("God. Guts. Guns. I don't call 911." (bumper sticker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

"I think my security proposals for the country were smack"

We can stop right there, John. You are a smack and so are your "plans" (or whatever other idea you hoped to steal)

By the way, we haven't seen the 180 yet? The pen should still be warm in your hand, go ahead, just zign ze paperz.


24 posted on 02/15/2005 3:48:23 PM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: redlenses
I think this money is important to our being successful and to the completion of the process."

Huh? You mean as opposed to the previous spending bill that did NOT HELP to COMPLETE the PROCESS?

How can any reporter STOP from LAUGHING out loud at that statement while asking him HOW in Allah's name could NO MONEY, NO FOOD, NO AMMO, or NO EQUIPMENT have helped our TROOPS to succeed in bringing about the recent and successful elections in IRAQ?

25 posted on 02/15/2005 3:54:30 PM PST by PISANO (We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

as he stands before a roomful of reporters, how come not ONE asks politely why he hasn't signed the 180 yet?


26 posted on 02/15/2005 4:39:18 PM PST by bitt (Kerry "Hanoi"s me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

27 posted on 02/15/2005 4:40:09 PM PST by bitt (Kerry "Hanoi"s me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlenses
from a lefty site:


28 posted on 02/15/2005 4:41:48 PM PST by bitt (Kerry "Hanoi"s me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redlenses

This guy wants to remain relevant and Reuters wants to help him. I don't think there's anything more subtle than that going on here.


29 posted on 02/15/2005 4:43:13 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson