Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Sheik FUNDS foreign Terrorists (Yemeni teacher describes)
NEWSDAY.com ^ | February 16, 2005 | MICHAEL WEISSENSTEIN Associated Press

Posted on 02/17/2005 12:47:22 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell

OFFICIAL TITLE: Yemeni teacher describes terror-funding defendants as pacifists

For two weeks, a white-bearded Yemeni sheik and his assistant watched impassively in a Brooklyn courtroom while prosecutors portrayed them as vital cogs in a global terrorism-funding machine.

On Wednesday, Sheik Mohammed Ali Hassan al-Moayad and Mohammed Mohsen Yahya Zayed smiled and laughed as their first defense witness called them peace-loving men who denounced violence and dedicated their lives to Yemen's poor.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: jihadinamerica; ny; terroristfunding
I want to know why this is in CIVILIAN COURT. This needs to be brought before a MILITARY court.
1 posted on 02/17/2005 12:47:24 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joedelta; truth_seeker



I asked to Repost this under a new title. I think this story is important.




2 posted on 02/17/2005 12:50:35 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ("Hi I'm Sean Hannity, BUY MY BOOK it's really good, Please someone BUY my BOOK, I'm for sale too")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

Why would it be in a military court? Most of the WOT arrests on American soil have and will continue to go through state and federal courts. I don't understand why you think it should be in a military court or why you think that would be better.


3 posted on 02/17/2005 12:55:18 PM PST by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

YEMEN is an anagram for ENEMY. Coincidence?


4 posted on 02/17/2005 1:09:33 PM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder



I think this should go to a military court, because these men are funding terrorists and that's a national security issue. They have ties to terrorist organisations.

Most of the WOT arrests should go to military court. This is what caused 9/11 in the first place, not enough communication between law enforcement branches.


5 posted on 02/17/2005 1:11:44 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell (" This is a conservative website, not a Republican website.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

Stand them against a wall...


6 posted on 02/17/2005 1:16:54 PM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

Coincidence?

I think NOT.



7 posted on 02/17/2005 1:17:45 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell (" This is a conservative website, not a Republican website.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

National security is also an FBI issue and FBI cases go to federal courts. It's also an issue for local and state cops, and those go to state courts. I don't understand why military courts are better to you than state or federal courts. I also don't see why you think military courts improve communication between law enforcement branches.

You may be right, I just don't follow your reasoning.


8 posted on 02/17/2005 1:23:22 PM PST by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder


I feel that national security issues should be military. These men are funding overseas Terrorism. Our Troops are fighting oversease terrorism. These men are funding the same people we are fighting.


9 posted on 02/17/2005 1:25:47 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE first-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell
OK, trying this in a new thread...

during khat sessions, meetings where Yemeni men gather to chew the leaves of a semi-narcotic plant and discuss the events of the day.

Khat is not 'semi-narcotic.' It is a full blown narcotic. Khat is what the Skinnies were chewing to get brave enough to face my friends in the streets of Somalia. Khat is what the Skinnies had been chewing when they were filmed dragging one of our boys through the streets.

And, in these discussions of the day's events, these freaks are discussing the attacks on Americans that day.

Hang the freak.

10 posted on 02/17/2005 1:30:45 PM PST by joedelta (Those who long for peace must prepare for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder
I don't understand why military courts are better to you than state or federal courts.

I'll give you a reason. If found guilty in a military court, the terrorist actually faces a Death Penalty.

If tried and convicted in, oh, say New York or California, the terrorist would face a penalty of 10-30 years with no early parole until next Tuesday. Probably get off with time served already.

11 posted on 02/17/2005 1:34:21 PM PST by joedelta (Those who long for peace must prepare for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell
Knox showed al-Zahr a surveillance videotape of al-Moayad and Zayed laughing during a discussion with an FBI informant about a suicide bombing in Israel. The prosecutor asked the witness if the tape changed his opinion that the defendants were peaceful men.

"All of that is lies and forged," al-Zahr said.

You're right. Was filmed on the same lot where the US government filmed the supposed "moon landings."

In TROP it is not only acceptable, it is required to lie to infidels to further the cause of TROP. Guess that's what this bozak was doing.

12 posted on 02/17/2005 1:39:35 PM PST by joedelta (Those who long for peace must prepare for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm


WE SHOULD!


13 posted on 02/17/2005 1:41:24 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE first-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell; joedelta

It is an FBI case made largely in Germany using an FBI informant and wire taps. I don't see what legal mechanism puts it in a military court. Further, they were extradited from Germany and if the death penalty had been on the table Germany would not have let us have them (probably). Further, it is in a federal court, and at least on paper they could face the death penalty if the crimes they committed allowed for a death penalty which, as I understand it, they do not.

Military courts are fine and good for combatants, and I understand that our federal courts especially are permeated with liberal judges who undermine prosecutors at every opportunity, but regardless we have a judicial system that has been largely successful for the past two and one-quarter centuries and I don't see a good reason for dismantling our judicial system for the sole purpose of trying two Yemeni freaks - sorry, sheiks - in a military court.


14 posted on 02/17/2005 1:42:21 PM PST by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder


I disagree
""The defendants are charged with conspiring to fund and attempting to fund Hamas and al-Qaida. ""

They probably know something we don't.


15 posted on 02/17/2005 1:49:33 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE first-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

Conspiring to fund Hamas and al-Qaeda is not punishable by death. You can think that it should be, but it is not.


16 posted on 02/17/2005 2:04:50 PM PST by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell

Personally, I think the good sheik and his associate should be carted off to the Sears tower in Chicago and pushed out of a 90th story window. Let them experience the horror that some of our fellow Americans experienced on 9/11.


17 posted on 02/17/2005 2:12:24 PM PST by reagan_fanatic ("Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence" - R. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LauraleeBraswell; joedelta

I've been thinking a lot about this thread and Lauralee's question about putting it in a military court, and I've tried to put this into a historical context ... what if it were 1942 and these were people raising money for Nazis.

I think Lauralee has a valid point about this being a military matter. The thing about this story that bothered me is why did the FBI do all this. Technically, their jurisdiction stops at the border. When the Cole was bombed, we sent in the FBI to investigate and that was just stupid. We should have sent in the military.

But the military doesn't arrest people and try people, the military kills people.

So, in time of war, rather than send in the FBI to do a sting operation on these guys, it should have been handled by military intelligence or naval intelligence. Honest to goodness military spies should be doing this work. And rather than arrest, they should just kill - no trial, no prosecutors, no judges. That's what Wild Bill's OSS would have done 60 years ago.

So, after some further thought, in principle I agree that this does not belong in a federal court. It's a military matter and the military kills people.

And shooting a couple of Muslims in Germany doesn't cause me any concerns ... certainly the Mossad would do it.


18 posted on 02/18/2005 5:16:00 PM PST by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder
It makes me feel so good that you read this story and thought about it. The more people to know there is a problem, the more who want to solve it.
I live in NY and things like this scare me.
The fact that these Muslim leaders were raising money for foreign terrorist organizations in the midst of NYC is appalling.
Of course it was ignored by mainstream media. And the title of the original article doesn't even concentrate on the real issue here.
so thank you
19 posted on 02/18/2005 5:26:19 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder
I've been thinking a lot about this thread and Lauralee's question about putting it in a military court, and I've tried to put this into a historical context ... what if it were 1942 and these were people raising money for Nazis.

Well, what did happen in WWII? There were Germans found that were trying to subvert the American war effort. The FBI found them. The FBI arrested them. The military tried them. Why? They weren't treated as criminals, but as irregular combatants.

20 posted on 02/18/2005 6:48:30 PM PST by joedelta (Those who long for peace must prepare for war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson