Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RadioAstronomer
No offense, but what is silly is RadioAstronomer responding to a thread where people are so ignorant of science that they think the sticker even makes sense.

You can't have a conversation with people that refuse to accept simple definitions. It's a waste of time at best, and cruel at worst, like poking an animal in a cage with a sharp stick.

266 posted on 02/18/2005 7:33:10 AM PST by tjg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: tjg
No offense, but what is silly is RadioAstronomer responding to a thread...

LOL! RadioAstronomer is often silly. :-)

272 posted on 02/18/2005 8:51:29 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

To: tjg; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; ThinkPlease; Right Wing Professor; Doctor Stochastic; ...
No offense, but what is silly is RadioAstronomer responding to a thread where people are so ignorant of science that they think the sticker even makes sense.

You can't have a conversation with people that refuse to accept simple definitions. It's a waste of time at best, and cruel at worst, like poking an animal in a cage with a sharp stick.

It's worse than that; much worse. In the history of the world, only a tiny fraction of all the people who ever lived have had the opportunity to ask highly qualified scientists direct questions, and learn from their wisdom. Happily, because of the internet and places like FR, it is now possible for people from all walks of life to converse directly with all sorts of scientific experts; we have physicists, microbiologists, mathematicians, astronomers, and chemists, to specify but a few, roaming these threads, and eager to explain what they know and how they know it to virtually anyone willing to ask an intelligent question.

But there is another segment of people on these threads who, instead of asking these learned folks intelligent questions and thus expanding their knowledge and understanding, insist instead upon bludgeoning them with their ignorance, and questioning the patriotism, honesty, and intellect of people who have dedicated their lives to the pursuit of scientific knowledge.

I submit that such people are not here to learn anything, but are in fact interested in quite the opposite. I submit they are here to interfere with the dissemination of scientific knowledge that they find offensive. They don't want other people to ask the experts questions and learn from them; no, they are hear to attack the experts and cast doubt upon their wisdom, in the desperate hope that others will turn away and not listen to them.

IMHO that is why the same people show up over and over again parroting the same refuted diatribes and misinformation, and spewing the same bogus out-of-context quotes designed specifically to disrupt the dissemination of scientific knowledge. That why the same people show up over and over again misrepresenting what scientific theories and laws are, despite having had it explained to them 1720th time; they are here to instill confusion and spread their ignorance, not to disseminate knowledge.

The experts here on these threads ought to be revered and thanked for sharing with us their insights and explanations of the natural world around us; instead scorn is heaped upon them and their knowledge by the belligerently ignorant. I submit that these purveyors of unknowledge should be treated for the intellectual disruptors that they are. The stare the best opportunity any of us will ever have to gain more insight and understanding in the face, and spit in the eyes of those who offer and have the knowledge to help make that a reality.

Behold, I give you the belligerently ignorant, the intellectual Luddite's of our time. Know them for the anti-knowledge disruptors they are.

294 posted on 02/18/2005 1:23:22 PM PST by longshadow (freeper #405.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson