To: ClintonBeGone
He wasn't singled out for whatever it is in his past they're accusing him of. It's because he simply asked a question.
BTW, for all that Gannon's accused of, he's qualified to represent Massachusetts in the House or Senate, given the standards of liberals.
10 posted on
02/18/2005 6:38:59 AM PST by
kristinn
To: kristinn
He wasn't singled out for whatever it is in his past they're accusing him of. It's because he simply asked a question.
But he's radioactive because of the sex websites and the naked pictures that are now also part of the story. I don't see why you would stick your neck out until he's explained the entire story. This is a Jerry Springer society - no one is going to remember the question that started all this, they're going to remember you sticking up for a guy with a creepy past.
23 posted on
02/18/2005 7:09:31 AM PST by
ClintonBeGone
(In politics, sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
To: kristinn
BTW, for all that Gannon's accused of, he's qualified to represent Massachusetts in the House or Senate, given the standards of liberals.Are you saying Gannon's an alcoholic and meets with our enemies, as well as being an operator of risque web sites?
To: kristinn
BTW, for all that Gannon's accused of, he's qualified to represent Massachusetts in the House or Senate, given the standards of liberals.I just love it when we lower ourselves to their standards. Gives me chills. .
To: kristinn
BTW, for all that Gannon's accused of, he's qualified to represent Massachusetts in the House or Senate, given the standards of liberals. Toooooo-shaaaay!
336 posted on
02/20/2005 8:33:40 PM PST by
L.N. Smithee
(NHL Owners and Players: Take the advice of Benjamin Franklin - "Unite, or die.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson