Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darkwolf377; billbears

FYI, Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky and Missouri remained in the Union during the war and were also slave states. In addition, Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamaion was written only for the slaves in the South. Those in the North were excluded. Of course, as everyone knows, the Proclamation freed no one; it was only used in an attempt to incite insurrection among the slaves.


171 posted on 02/20/2005 10:52:22 AM PST by sheltonmac (http://statesrightsreview.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: sheltonmac

Yeah. The slaves were freed by Jefferson Davis, I guess. Lincoln had nothing to do with it. Hooboy...


173 posted on 02/20/2005 10:55:43 AM PST by Darkwolf377 ("Drowning someone...I wouldn't have a part in that."--Teddy K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

To: sheltonmac
"The first of January, 1863, was a memorable day in the progress of American liberty and civilization. It was the turning-point in the conflict between freedom and slavery. A death blow was then given to the slaveholding rebellion. Until then the federal arm had been more than tolerant to that relict of barbarism. The secretary of war, William H. Seward, had given notice to the world that, "however the war for the Union might terminate, no change would be made in the relation of master and slave." Upon this pro-slavery platform the war against the rebellion had been waged during more than two years. It had not been a war of conquest, but rather a war of conciliation. McClellan, in command of the army, had been trying, apparently, to put down the rebellion without hurting the rebels, certainly without hurting slavery, and the government had seemed to coöperate with him in both respects.

Charles Sumner, William Lloyd Garrison, Wendell Phillips, Gerrit Smith, and the whole anti-slavery phalanx at the North, had denounced this policy, and had besought Mr. Lincoln to adopt an opposite one, but in vain. Generals, in the field, and councils in the Cabinet, had persisted in advancing this policy through defeats and disasters, even to the verge of ruin. We fought the rebellion, but not its cause. And now, on this day of January 1st, 1863, the formal and solemn announcement was made that thereafter the government would be found on the side of emancipation. This proclamation changed everything."

--Life and Times, Frederick Douglass

I guess someone should have told Douglass that the Emancipation Proclamation did nothing to free the slaves.

174 posted on 02/20/2005 11:02:03 AM PST by Darkwolf377 ("Drowning someone...I wouldn't have a part in that."--Teddy K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

To: sheltonmac
FYI, Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky and Missouri remained in the Union during the war and were also slave states. In addition, Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamaion was written only for the slaves in the South. Those in the North were excluded.

Lincoln had no Constitutional power to free slaves in non-rebel states without a Constitutional Amendment.

226 posted on 02/21/2005 8:05:29 AM PST by Modernman ("Normally, I don't listen to women, or doctors." - Captain Hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson