Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sheltonmac
If the point was to free the slaves--if he indeed had that power--then Lincoln would have included ALL slaves, not just those in the South.

The Supreme Court had already established the legality of the Confiscation Acts which allowed the government to seize without compensation private property if it was used to further the cause of the rebellion. The Emanicpation Proclamation can be seen as a continuation of that. Slaves were used in support of the rebellion, freeing them in those states in rebellion was a valid tool to be used against the southern war effort.

220 posted on 02/21/2005 7:01:22 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
The Supreme Court had already established the legality of the Confiscation Acts which allowed the government to seize without compensation private property if it was used to further the cause of the rebellion.

PRIOR to the war the Supreme Court had ruled that uncompensated takings were unconstitutional. See the 5th Amendment.

221 posted on 02/21/2005 7:20:52 AM PST by 4CJ (Laissez les bon FReeps rouler - "Accurately quoting Lincoln is a bannable offense.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson