[BraveMan]

OK, now that you've gotten the namecalling out of the way, kindly refute Race's statement with your eloquent logic.

[RaceBannon]

That's okay, My name is Jim, Not Sean.....

[RaceBannon]

Besides, now the evolutionsists must face the facts again, that one of their sacred cows has been proven to be a fraud, and that the evidence is based upon a fairy tale, not facts, because once again, REAL SCIENCE proves them wrong again...like it always does when we examine the science, not the fairy tale...

Just like Piltdown man...

and that the Bible is once again shown to be more accurate than any evolutionists dream...I mean, fairy tale...

[Dimensio]

kindly refute Race's statement with your eloquent logic.

Race's statement was based upon fallacious reasoning. He asserted that because one man was shown to have engaged in fraudulent practices, the theory of evolution is false, even though the theory of evolution is neither founded upon nor based in any significant part on the work of the now exposed fraudster.

RaceBannon did not make a logical statement, thus there's no need to refute it. He appealed to an illogical connection, and I was merely making a note of it.