Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

He seems hopeful it will happen soon. We'll see. Right now in my old age, it seems like all the talk of fusion power being 'right around the corner'.
1 posted on 02/21/2005 4:38:48 AM PST by nuke rocketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nuke rocketeer; RhoTheta

Disembodied voice: "2nd floor: lingerie, make-up, rebreathers, jewelry, micro-meteors, and Tang. Watch that first step, please!"


2 posted on 02/21/2005 4:54:46 AM PST by Egon (Government is a guard-dog to be fed, not a cow to be milked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuke rocketeer

I had read that the space elevator wouldn't work beacause the tensional stress required in the cable was unendurable by any known material. Has that changed in the recent past?


3 posted on 02/21/2005 5:06:23 AM PST by lafroste (gravity is not a force, dangit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuke rocketeer

This is the modern version of the Hindu Rope Trick!........


4 posted on 02/21/2005 5:15:29 AM PST by Red Badger (I call her GODZILLARY because she went to NYC and made her nest there, too.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuke rocketeer
According to the article, the elevator would travel at speeds as slow as 10 MPH. The international space station is 220 miles above the earth? Who's going to sit on an elevator for 22 hours?

Look, if we can perceive of technology capable of 200-300 mile high elevator, then why not look to develop technology similar to that from Star Trek--the transporter, or the shuttles--which could get a person from the ground to space in mere minutes? After all, if we're going to fantasize about future modes of transportation, then let's really use our imagination.

It seems to me that even if this guy is serious, he's also looking in the wrong direction for scientific advancement.

8 posted on 02/21/2005 5:35:20 AM PST by Military family member (Go Colts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuke rocketeer
“Once you reduce the cost to almost a Fed-Ex kind of level, it opens the doors to lots of people, lots of countries, and lots of companies to get involved in space,” Edwards emphasized. No longer will space travel be limited to the United States, Europe, Russia, China, and other major players

Hmm, this strikes me as a BAD thing actually... with the current state of terrorists and wackos around the globe... if you catch my drift..
21 posted on 02/21/2005 6:22:47 AM PST by Barney59 (Now there's a man with an open mind - you can feel the breeze from here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuke rocketeer

Wasn't this same concept proposed in the book "Red Mars" by Kim Stanley Robinson back in '93?


22 posted on 02/21/2005 6:24:11 AM PST by Sarajevo (Sarajevo is the beginning of 20th century history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuke rocketeer; SittinYonder
Know what I thought of?

Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator

Watch out for the Vermicius Knids!!

26 posted on 02/21/2005 6:43:38 AM PST by eyespysomething (Vous pouvez vous rendre au garde de securite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuke rocketeer
This whole thing smells like "liberal"...
Can't put my finger on it but I detect the distinct odor of "Liberal" to it..
Like communism "sounds" good at first, but can't possibly work...
Socialism has always been the result of elite humans organizing primates or a political zoo..
Just the same, this scheme has scam written all over it..

One wonders what the "jet stream" will have to say about all this..
This sounds like multi-level marketing to me..
Calling all Amway distributors.!. the ultimate scam has finally arrived..

NOTE....
Leftist "scientists" <<-- are Moe, Larry and Curly with governmental support..

36 posted on 02/21/2005 7:37:27 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuke rocketeer

Nanotubes are called that because of diameter not length. That said, current production is only a few microns long. However, we are working on joining them end-to-end to make cables. They have enough tensile strength to make the elevator feasible. As for power and the angular momentum questions, remember that we can generate ENORMOUS quantities of power by lowering asteroidal mass, e.g., mined platinum, DOWN the cable assembly (its not a single cable, but a group of joined cables). Imagine a turbine with a "head" of 22000 miles and you get the picture.


38 posted on 02/21/2005 8:14:04 AM PST by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuke rocketeer

Don't reinvent the wheel--this has all been solved long ago. See Genesis 28:10-16.


39 posted on 02/21/2005 8:39:50 AM PST by Hebrews 11:6 (Look it up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nuke rocketeer

Some of the doubters need to visit the website for the company founded by the late Dr. Robert Forward, Tethers Unlimited. The plan is for multiple, mutually supporting cables in case one fails, which is insured by space debris. However, if the cable is cut it cannot fall far because of the cross linking. As for cutting the Earth's magnetic field lines and generating enormous electric power, single walled carbon nanotubes conduct electricity better than copper.


51 posted on 02/21/2005 10:20:45 AM PST by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson