Predictably, the articles project the impression that everything is in order.:) Can you detect anything missing or out of place in these article? Since I do not go over them carefully, I do not know what to or what not to expect from this kind of articles.
They are much of the same, worn out propaganda. That is, the Chia Pet, the Short-Donged One visits these various KPA or Naval units (specific location or day never usually given to my knowledge), goes through the same inspections and "on the spot guidance", gives the same damn commemorative binoculars and rifles (probably his aides then just take them back for presentation to the next unit of saps), poses for the same damn pictures with the boys, and away he gingerly goes. For all I know, they could be taking this visits and simply changing the locations, and using the same boilerplate. They obviously are trying to project normality. I guess the proof in the pudding would be by visible increased protection for Kim in Pyongyang, and or other indications that I would not go into here in open forum, that we may be picking up out of there.