Think back to John (the French Looking One) Kerry back in March,2004. He had a free ride from the liberal media(a redundantcy), he had a low negative number, high positives, and then the Bush team went to work to define him, and the whole picture changed.
Analyzing and polling H. R.Clinton's chances for 2008 right now is so premature and futile, it makes as much sense as analyzing the election in Iran, which will probably take place before then.
Vince Foster's mistress could have a 0 negative rating and it wouldn't matter, until her opponents begin to define her
as the power-hungry political beast she really is.
Thats not the way I saw it. We had a war-time President up against Kerry's incompetent campaign and we won by a mere 120k in Ohio. If not for the Swifties and Rathergate...