Posted on 2/23/2005, 11:25:37 PM by nyg4168
A bipartisan panel of state lawmakers that studied the effectiveness of President Bush's No Child Left Behind initiative assailed it today as a flawed, convoluted and unconstitutional education reform effort that had usurped state and local control of public schools.
While the report, based on hearings in several cities, praised the legislation's goal of ending the gap in scholastic achievement between white and minority students, most of its 77 pages was devoted to a detailed inventory and discussion of the initiative's flaws.
It found that the law undermined other school improvement efforts already under way in many states, and it said that the law's accountability system, which punishes schools whose students fail to improve steadily on standardized tests, relied on the wrong indicators.
"Under N.C.L.B., the federal government's role has become excessively intrusive in the day-to-day operations of public education," the National Conference of State Legislatures said in its panel's report. "The task force does not believe that N.C.L.B. is constitutional."
Several educational experts said the task force had accurately captured the views of thousands of state lawmakers and local educators. If so, then the Bush administration may face a growing chorus of challenges to the law and to the Department of Education's implementation of it over the coming months.
Nine state legislatures are currently considering various challenges to the law, and the Utah Senate is poised to vote on a bill already passed by its House that would require Utah education officials to give higher priority to state education laws than to the federal law.
Several business and other groups that strongly support the federal No Child Left Behind legislation took issue with the report, saying that the report's authors had overstated the quality of the state programs that they said the federal government had hampered.
In preparing their report, task force members worked for 10 months and held a series of public hearings in Washington, Chicago, Salt Lake City, New York, Santa Fe and Portland. The panel also met for deliberations in Savannah, Ga.
"They went out and heard lots of things from different people around the country, and this report reflects the breadth and depth of what they heard," said Patricia Sullivan, director of the Washington-based Center on Education Policy, who attended hearings in two cities.
An assistant secretary of education, Ray Simon, met with members of the task force in Washington today to discuss the report.
"The department will continue to work with every state to address their concerns and make this law work for their children," the Education Department said in a statement. "But the report could be interpreted as wanting to reverse the progress we've made."
It added, "No Child Left Behind is bringing new hope and new opportunity to families throughout America, and we will not reverse course."
Kill all federal involvement in education before it kills our schools.
?????????
Actually, I think we would be better off turning the public school system over to the Department of Defense. Lackland and Randolph Air Base schools in San Antonio each rank at the top for academic excellence. Only the richer school districts, such as Alamo Heights, perform equally well.
NEA, not NCLB, is killing your schools.
Dissolve the NEA!!!!
You got it Get rid of the NEA,
If education was a business it would be out of business.
Here in Oklahoma we have the Oklahoma Association of Public Educators (APOE) as the alternative to OEA which is nothing more than union teachers. APOE is gaining ground here in our State and they call for teacher and student accountability. NCLB is not the problem -- it is the teacher's union. Only reason for NCLB is that the States and local districts are not doing their job -- would rather protect union teachers.
APOE is nationwide and would recommend if a state does not have an active organization, then teachers need to form a State APOE to oppose the Union teachers and get some accountability in the schools.
The whole idea is based on the flawed premise that all children can learn above average every year; sounds like a serious attempt to attain the impossible but humorous Lake Wo Begone model.
Nope, just dissolve it.
"Nope, just dissolve it."
Go for it.
In the mean time others will seek more practical action. :-)
So tell me what is "practical" about keeping a nationalized education organization?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.