Didn't see this posted yet.
1 posted on
02/24/2005 2:29:42 PM PST by
Buck W.
To: Buck W.
A Carter appointee,, 83 years old, time for this one to go home.
http://www.fjc.gov/servlet/uGetInfo?jid=2324
Judges of the United States Courts Sweet, Robert Workman
- Born 1922 in Yonkers, NY
Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Nominated by Jimmy Carter on February 17, 1978, to a seat vacated by Inzer B. Wyatt; Confirmed by the Senate on April 25, 1978, and received commission on April 28, 1978. Assumed senior status on March 1, 1991.
Education:
Yale University, B.A., 1944
Yale Law School, LL.B., 1948
Professional Career:
U.S. Navy Lieutenant (j.g.), 1943-1946
Private practice, New York City, 1948-1953
Assistant U.S. attorney, Southern District of New York, 1953-1955
Private practice, New York City, 1955-1965
Counsel, New York State Interdepartmental Task Force on Youth and Juvenile Delinquency, 1958
Executive assistant to the mayor, New York City, 1966
Deputy mayor, New York City, 1966-1969
Private practice, New York City, 1970-1978
Consultant, Association for a Better New York, New York City, 1970-1975
Hearing officer, New York Transit Authority, Brooklyn, New York, 1975-1977
2 posted on
02/24/2005 2:42:57 PM PST by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
To: Buck W.
If we can't have secrecy in government then why can we have secrecy in the media who reports on the government? Dan Rather's career has proved that the media needs to be watched just as closely as the government does. The media have great power to affect what happens in government, and how everything is perceived by the public, which in turn affects who rules. The tie is clear. We must watch the watchers of government lest they corrupt everything.
4 posted on
02/24/2005 3:08:03 PM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real politcal victory, take your issue to court.)
To: Buck W.
The Supreme Court has already said that the press does not have this privelage, several times.
They must reveal their sources. This is settled law.
This judge is treading treacherously close to the idea that you can ignore the holy Supreme Court Precedent.
Roe v Wade is in danger if this ruling stands.
(that is not a sarcastic assessment - but it does put the libs/dims in a really really tough spot)
7 posted on
02/24/2005 3:27:53 PM PST by
Phsstpok
("When you don't know where you are, but you don't care, you're not lost, you're exploring.")
To: Buck W.
And now, for the biggest impact of bloggers...
Who is a journalist?
Can't wait for the SCOTUS contortions on this. A couple of years back they took it upon themselves to define what is and what isn't essential to golf. Walking didn't make the cut.
Can't wait to hear what the uber-government tells contsitutes a journalist.
8 posted on
02/24/2005 3:54:42 PM PST by
Dilbert56
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson