[BenLurkin]

So the "human rights" crowd is unmasked as being the pawns of Communists and Islamofacism.

Maybe they would have sided with the Axis if they'd been around in 1942.

[pissant]

"For this, his reputation has been smeared by left-wing nostalgics who can't get over their opposition to the Reagan policy.."
____________________________________

This would include John Kerry and the vast majority in the quisling party.

[Txsleuth]

I guess the libs won't even consider the idea that fighting Bush on every single one of his nominees is gonna backfire!!!

Just like Ollie North---they may call Negroponte a "bad guy", but I call him a patriotic American.

[blackeagle]

personally i feel this is just another useless layer of government... i shudder to think the amount of damage this position could do it a democrat was to put some one like Janet reno in it. it was rather short sighted and goes against what we want to accomplish shrinking government and bureaucracy.

[Tacis]

These neocommunists think they won the past two elections. As rabid anti-Americans, they will protest ANY ONE W nominates for any position. Their objective is to oppose, to try to take the side of our country's enemies. They are not looking for compromise nor will they suggest a viable name; they simply want to block and tear down.

This is why Sphincter suggestion that W "pick up the 'phone" is such BS. No one pretending to be dem leaders has any interest in doing ANYTHING that would help W or make America look good while W is in charge.

These jerks will oppose Negroponte. They might "approve" a Sandinista or a Kerry backed Viet Cong, but an American backed by W, no, never!