Two county officials make shift to GOP (Howard Dean loses a few more red state votes)

Huntsville Item ^ | 2/26/05 | Kurt Allen

[Libloather]

2 county officials make shift to GOP
By Kurt Allen/Assistant Managing Editor

When Robyn Flowers and Barbara Hale were trying to find their place in the world of politics, it was almost a given it would be the Democratic Party. Growing up in the South, Democrats ruled the region, and there was little thought given to being Republican.

"I think probably, like most people my age, if you were born and raised in Texas, you've been a Democrat because that's what your family did," said Hale, Walker County's court-at-law judge.

How the times do change.

Now the South, and Texas in particular, has become heavily Republican as the GOP has come to represent the beliefs once held by Democrats.

It was for that reason, albeit on a deep, personal level, that Hale and District Clerk Robyn Flowers announced Thursday their switch to the Republican Party.

Such party switches, on a state or national scale, are rare. But in Walker County, it's happened on an increasing basis. The two elected officials join three others who made the move since late 2003. Walker County District Attorney David Weeks and Walker County Judge Danny Pierce switched to the GOP last year, while State Judge Bill McAdams made the move in 2003.

The shift wasn't easy for Hale, who said she struggled with the decision.

"It was really hard for me to change parties, because one of the qualities I admire in people is loyalty," she said.

But the Democratic Party's shift over the past couple of decades had slowly eroded her confidence in the group. When John Kerry earned the party's presidential nomination, and later when Howard Dean was tabbed as the Democratic leader, Hale's decision was finalized.

"When they went with Howard Dean, it just hit me. I'm being loyal to a party that hasn't been loyal to me," she said. "I just can't do it."

Hale's opinion represents a general consensus among many politicians at all levels, said Russell Martinez, chairman of the Republican Party of Walker County.

"I think that probably started with (Ronald) Reagan, actually, before he became president, as early as 1964," Martinez said. "He really set the tone for the more traditional values."

Those values, long the backbone of Southern Democrats, became key points in the Republican platform. By the time Reagan replaced Jimmy Carter as president in 1980, the move was on in earnest. By the time George W. Bush was elected president in 2000 and 2004, virtually the entire South had gone to the GOP.

"It was bound to happen as the Republican Party shifted to a more conservative (ideology), the Democrats shifted to a more liberal stance," Martinez said. "More and more people began to identify with those issues and those principals (adopted by Republicans)."

The belief Reagan was a catalyst for this political shift provided Martinez an interesting backdrop for Thursday's dinner honoring the two-term president who died last year. He said it was Reagan's strengthening of the GOP that brought the party to where it is today.

"It's really kind of fitting what's happened here in Walker County, that we were able to honor Ronald Reagan last night and have a lot of the things he set forth come into play last night," Martinez said, referring to the party shift. "It was really exciting."

While partisan politics doesn't play as critical a role in Walker County campaigns, for some officials, the decision to shift was still big because many voters opt for a straight-ticket vote.

"I think it's important for those folks that don't take the time to study individual races and individual candidates," Hale said. "That gives them something to hang their hat on. There are a lot of folks who work long, hard hours, and they don't have the time to study individual races."

But for Flowers, the shift was less about party politics and more about personal standards.

"Well, I just feel like the Republican Party more follows my beliefs and values," she said. "I've been praying on this for three or four months. A party affiliation to me is not that critical. I base my beliefs on people on what I believe their values are, what their beliefs are.

"I believe that goes countywide as well."

She isn't worried the party change will have much of an impact on how voters respond to her when she runs for re-election.

"I think the majority of the people locally vote for who they feel will do the best job for the county," she said. "The majority of my friends are Republicans, and have been for a long time. They supported me in running, in spite of my party affiliations. I feel those people voted for me because of who I was."

But Hale has a little more concern about the change.

"I'm filing at the end of this year to run in 2006. I'm sure it will be an issue with those people that have supported me in the past, and I don't blame them for having that issue, because loyalty is very big to me," she said. "But I hope they haven't become disillusioned by the job I'm doing. In this job, you have no party. When you go in with the robe, it's you and following the law."

[cgbg]

You made an argument as to why the Canal is not as important as it was in the early 1900s.

However, you did not answer the poster's question.

Great powers advance--they do not retreat.

Carter was the King of Malaise--and if we had men like him leading us in the past twenty-five years we would be begging to join the European Union to save our economy and the Canadian military to protect our national security. :-(

[seadevil]

I think it's probably fair to say, that up until about 1968 or so, it could be argued that the party of FDR, Truman, JFK, etc was probably more in tune with "traditional America"; at least it appeared that way.

At that point, the far-Left invaded and occupied the modern Democratic party and has held a strangle-hold ever since. It may not be that way at the local level, but the party is run at the top level by them. And in the arena of national politics, that's all that matters. No matter what the belief structure is at the local level of a national political party, it becomes subservient to the national party whims; it must, for funding, recognition, etc., demands that it does.

I'm a registered Independent; been one for over two decades. My ideology is probably about 60% or so "conservative" (traditional; because these things have been proven over time to be the best way), 20% or so "liberal" (willing to make changes but only as long as the individual merits on a case-by-case basis, filtered through a screen of factual data and careful research, show that the change makes sense and will cause fairly universal improvement) and the other 20% divided between revolutionary anarchist and evolutionary anarchist (when all else fails, the proper application of violence is needed to either destroy and rebuild; or be employed to preserve).

As far as my relationship with who I prefer in national office is concerned, I filter that through Constitutional absolutism; that documents means what is says and doesn't mean what it doesn't say. And if you want the federal Government to do something that isn't specifically delineated in that document, there is a mechanism for change. The "living document" concept is a figment of modern imagination.

What a person DOES means more to me than what a person SAYS he will do. I follow Patrick Henry's statement; "I know of no light to guide the future but by the past."

I therefore vote for that person who most closely mirrors my ideals; regardless of the label they carry. I suspect that a great many Americans instinctively and privately in the voting booth echo some of everything I just articulated.

The events of 9/11 simply accelerated that process. That shattering event kicked the pendulum of American politics to the Right and woke up a large majority who instinctively understood that Evil needed to be hunted down and eradicated; regardless of whose "sensibilities" this concept may "offend". All bets are now off and it will remain that way for several generations, probably. It is unlikely that ANYONE who doesn't articulate clearly that they will continue this eradication effort will ever see high national office for the foreseeable future. It remains to be seen, however, just how far that pendulum will swing; 45 to 50 years or so is probably a good estimate since it swung to the Left at least that long.

[Tall_Texan]

In the story, you find clues that these two ladies were just DINOs and hadn't drank the party Kool Aid:

One mentioned "values". Democrats don't have any.

One mentioned praying about her decision. Democrats don't pray or, if they do, it's to some God they believe is too weak to do any good. Anyway, this God they believe in should be kept out of their schools at all cost, they think.

One even goes on to say all her friends are Republican. A true Democrat would never let that happen. Democrats believe all Republicans are neandrathal morons who want to rape the world for oil.

Finally, one mentions that whenever she puts on her robe, she's not Democrat or Republican but just following the law. Now, is that the attitude of a modern Democrat I ask? The Democrat thinks the law is something to be worked around in order to spread their ideology.

I'd argue these women just had a difficult time abandoning the party of their parents and grandparents, sort of like switching to Cheer afrer using Tide all their lives.

[DixieOklahoma]

With southern democrats you had social conservatism and economic liberalism. since the end of reconstruction, a republican could not be found anywhere in the south. Infact I know some people who are still registered democrats so that they can have a say in who the local sheriff is. At one point it didn't matter who you were, if you were a yellow dog, or a blue kangaroo, if you were a democrat (and therefore a real southerner, not a northern republican - who was associated with civil war ills) you were voted into office.

The crazy thing is that the deomcrat primary was where the real action and coverage was, not election day. Most money was spent on advertising and promoting in the primarys, because it didn't matter who the republican running against you was..if there even was one.



This all changed when the national democrats started rearing their ugly liberal faces. If republicans prove to be loyal to conservatism then you won't see the yellow dog democrats in the south and instead you'd see yellow dog republicans.

[Luke21]

Don't forget Gerald Ford, the worst RINO weasel ever, and the reason Carter got elected.

[speedy]

DIW -- if I may jump into the game a bit late here -- the most important activists in the Democratic Party have been far left for over 70 years. They did not represent in any way the family and moral values you asked about. However, they were easily able to manipulate a naive and trusting electorate of largely uneducated people by putting forward political candidates who often did embrace the normal virtues on a personal level, while at the same time promoting economic dependency on the government. Since at least the New Deal (and actually even further back, but that represents a stark demarcation) the GOP has in general been the party of the middle class, the bourgeois values, the self-reliant. The Dems have been the party of entitlement, class warfare and victimization. It's just that now, more people have figured it out, and the percentage of normal, emotionally stable people in the Democratic Party is becoming a shrinking minority.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

Thank you, Speedy, and everyone else that answered my question. I came to care about politics late in life, so there's been a learning curve for me...but I'm catchin' up! :)

[speedy]

You done good fast, Diana!! Glad you're on our side!!

[staytrue]

Don't forget Gerald Ford, the worst RINO weasel ever, and the reason Carter got elected

Carter was elected by about 50,000 votes in Ohio of all places and this was one of the closest elections ever until 2000 came along. Gerald Ford pardonned Nixon and the Watergate scandal was why Carter won. Ford was a wonderful guy, respected by his republican peers enough to elect him house minority leader.

[staytrue]

You made an argument as to why the Canal is not as important as it was in the early 1900s.

It is plainly evident that the Canal is not very important economically or militarily now and was considered to be of declining value in the 1970's.

It was questionable how we got the rights to it anyway. So we gave back something of little value to us.

[PGalt]

Good news! Thanks for the post...but about the picture???...I'll probably have nightmares! G'night.

[goldstategop]

As Texas goes, so goes the nation. No wonder the Left is not picking up any Red State converts. You'd hear Nikita Dean bragging about it if they were.

(Denny Crane: "There are two places to find the truth. First God and then Fox News.")

[nutmeg]

When John Kerry earned the party's presidential nomination, and later when Howard Dean was tabbed as the Democratic leader, Hale's decision was finalized.

"When they went with Howard Dean, it just hit me. I'm being loyal to a party that hasn't been loyal to me," she said. "I just can't do it."

Gotta love it ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

[Clemenza]

Is that Aunt Baru from Episode IV: A New Hope?

[Deetes]

That picture should have a (barf alert ) ;-)

I wonder how many more dimwts Deany boy will chase across the fence ?

[AmishDude]

And that party would be?

Don't you know?

You know the famous symbols:

[zygoat]

Thats what I figured. Might as well stay home on election day, or become a Moonie.

[Redbob]

"But for Flowers, the shift was less about party politics and more about personal standards."

Horseshit!

She is no more a Republican than John F. Kerry is, but she desperately wants to be re-elected!

There's been no sudden change in the South:
Anyone who couldn't figure out what was going on in the Dimocratic Party by the time Lyndon Johnson was elected is too clueless to be allowed into the GOP!