Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative
It was designed to be able to lose an engine during takeoff and still be able to takeoff.

I read that a little bit differently ... more like, it was designed to be able to lose an engine during takeoff and still be able to land safely somewhere close for repairs.

12 posted on 03/01/2005 2:24:25 PM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Ramsbotham
I read that a little bit differently ... more like, it was designed to be able to lose an engine during takeoff and still be able to land safely somewhere close for repairs.

This is a four engined plane. I you were talking about a 777, 767 of other twin-engined plane they would be required to land as soon as possible. In fact under Extended Twin Operations (ETOPS) rules, they aren't allowed to be further than 180 minutes flying time on one engine away from an emergency landing field at any time during a flight. Three and four engine aircraft have much more flexible rules for diversion to another airport.

26 posted on 03/01/2005 2:33:25 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

Yep.

It's called a safety factor.


30 posted on 03/01/2005 2:42:59 PM PST by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson