Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 82Marine89

"We are going to attack by all legal means," Derbez told reporters at a news conference. "We are presenting the reasons why we consider this action to be incorrect and illegal from the point of view not only of our government but also under U.S. law."

Mexico is taking this to a whole new level with this legal action. As this is saying US citizens do not have the right to assemble freely in US territory.

Free assembly is one of our most basic rights, and thus trying to disallow in short means they are taking control of the territory with Mexican law and sovereignty, and it would not be surprising if they can succeed, given our spineless politicians and greedy business lobbyists who want more slaves and would be unwilling to support the US constitution and who seem to have more influence over our courts than the US citizens.


37 posted on 03/01/2005 7:53:04 PM PST by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: seastay
Mexico is taking this to a whole new level with this legal action. As this is saying US citizens do not have the right to assemble freely in US territory.

You think you're outraged now, wait until your own government agrees with them.

40 posted on 03/01/2005 7:54:45 PM PST by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: seastay
"Free assembly is one of our most basic rights, and thus trying to disallow in short means they are taking control of the territory with Mexican law and sovereignty, and it would not be surprising if they can succeed, given our spineless politicians and greedy business lobbyists who want more slaves and would be unwilling to support the US constitution and who seem to have more influence over our courts than the US citizens."

Yep. It won't be the illegals the US will expend law enforcement resources on, but rather its own citizens.
Now, where was it that people got upset that the government let the people rely on themselves for defense, then turned around and tried to tax them, claiming that the people were being protected by their government and had to pay their 'fair share'? I think it was in 13 American colonies, a little over 230 years ago.

47 posted on 03/01/2005 8:14:13 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson