To: TheForceOfOne
Call Halliburton or one of its subsidiaries, Kellogg Brown & Root, maybe? That would make the leftie-liberals just NUTS.
59 posted on
03/02/2005 12:13:26 PM PST by
alloysteel
("Master of the painfully obvious.....")
To: alloysteel
I think a state by state contracted border patrol, bid on by security based companies who receive the contracts funded by a tax shared by all tax payers and supplemented by grants from the Federal Government by roll backs on funds designated for the "No Child Left Behind Act" or other areas where funds could be transfered for better use in order not to increase Federal tax. The security companies would be performance based and subject to loss of contract if requirements are not met. Companies that perform well in other states will be allowed to bid on contracts for other states. The current Border Patrol would concentrate on legal points of access for more thorough searches and background checks with no reduction in manpower, only redeployment. No taxes obtained for border security will be allowed transfer or borrowing against, and surplus funding will be used for future contracts or returned to tax payers as tax relief.
80 posted on
03/02/2005 6:55:29 PM PST by
TheForceOfOne
(Social Security – I thought pyramid schemes were illegal!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson