"So the family may have tried to extort money from him, so therefore he didn't molest this child or any other?"
I'm saying there's no compelling evidence. In this country people are innocent until proven guilty, and the proof is lacking.
Jackson may fit a profile of a pedifile. That doesn't make him a pedifile. Sexually abusing children makes him a pedifile. That's a charge that needs to be proven, and it doesn't look like the proof is there.
If I had kids I sure wouldn't let them go anywhere near Jackson.
I tried to find the article on Men's News Daily, but their archives are listed by author and I didn't see a Charlite, so I assume that's the freeper that posted the article, not the author of the article.
I'm not saying he is guilty, that will remain to be seen. However, I do believe, just simply my own opinion, that he is.
I have three boys, and there is no way that I would let Jackson within three states of my children. We had a pedophile that lived across the street from us and he was always outside with a telescope, to attract all the curious little boys( his favorite, by the way). My kids weren't allowed out the front door, without me or my husband. Sad really, this neighborhood is full of boys, and parents letting their kids run around and not knowing where their kids were. His yard was always full of kids and they were even going in his house. Unbelievable.
The article is titled, "Is Michael Jackson a Pediphile?" Just search by title, if you're interested.
By the way, I don't believe that he will be convicted. But I have to wonder how it is that children aren't afraid of him, because he scares that crap out of me. I'd be afraid that his nose would fall off in front me, then I'd be scarred forever.
=0)