[antonia]

[The bottom line is that it's not about necrophilia. It never was. It's about whether a body got embalmed or not, and unless it's a matter of religious belief, it's a stupid issue over which to have "nightmares."]


So you are of the opinion that because you believe that everyone else who doesn't also share your beliefs about death, must abide by your belief anyway?

The general tone, here in ‘FreeRepublic’, of lack of respect for the dead and their family is astounding, and indefensible.

I guess you feel that these students had a right to use any dead person’s body, as they feel fit. Why if someone is brain dead there should be a law that they must give all reusable parts to those who need them. Why stop there? Why wait until they are dead? You know it all anyway, why not take the parts when you know that the person is going to die anyway? Matter of fact, those who can not pay taxes, and have nothing else to profit your town with should be made to give an organ, just like they do in China, with those who do not toe party line.

[Xenalyte]

So you are of the opinion that because you believe that everyone else who doesn't also share your beliefs about death, must abide by your belief anyway?

I never said that. I don't find it necessary to preface my posts with "This is only my opinion, and I realize many of y'all don't share it, but . . ."

That's a waste of time and energy and bandwidth, because it goes without saying that what one posts, absent facts, is by definition one's opinion.

I would also thank you not to "guess" what I feel. You would be wasting valuable time that could be better spent - well, I don't know how you spend your time, but I have better things to do than argue with someone who takes my opinion to the ultimate extreme. It's a foolish tactic, and you know it.