Posted on 03/03/2005 8:06:06 PM PST by kingattax
hey biden.......SHUT UP
"“We have recently become aware that a Republican activist, with a potential criminal past,..."
Let's see, potential (in the future) criminal past (in the past). What the hell sense does that make? Prime and classic definition of ex Post Facto!
Great catch. Plus a terrorist, a killer of JEWS, was the most frequent GUEST of the Clinton's...Arafat.
Hey Biden...Shut Up and PLAGARIZE!
democRATS take a secret oath to make no sense and not let facts supercede their self-serving distortions of reality.
The operative words here are "Republican activist".
Does anyone believe that all of this furor would come to light if the "activist" had been a liberal?
How was it a security breach? The fact is that everybody that enters the White House press room almost certainly goes through a metal detector. What are they afraid of, that Gannon might have yelled something hurtful??? President Bush was never in any danger and these deceiful democrats know that. This is a patently dishonest display of fake concern. And the issue of the "assumed name" is a big red herring as well. The real fact is that Gannon applied for his "daily" press pass (a good for one day only pass, apparently not as hard to get as the democrats are acting) using his real name. He did not try to fool anybody at any time about his identity. He uses the name "Jeff Gannon" when he writes his column, as sort of a pen name. He is by no means the first journalist to use a pen name. Can you say Jerry Rivers (Geraldo Rivera)?
Hmmm .. what was that bouncer's name again???
bttt
I remember Gary Aldritch's book in whih he described clearances being waved for current drug users and people with criminals backgrounds.
It is easy to have outrage for all possible positions when you have no moral foundation.
Rats are hypocrites with selective memories.
Let me get this right
pro abortion
dont ask dont tell
anti death penalty for violent offenders
but a reporter has to tell his sexual preference but not the former president
stoppp!!!
You see, that's what I don't get, how it was a security breach. They had to go through some sort of search to get in. Colmes even asked Ari Fleischer about this on H&C tonight, and Ari kept saying Gannon had a press pass and was not felt to be a security risk.
Wish the dems would have felt that way when the Code Pink "ladies" got into front row seats at the inauguration. What if someone who meant harm to President Bush "accidentally" got one of the tickets?
What sticks in their craws is that Gannon supposedly asked a "soft" question - oh, like most of Clinton's questions weren't softballs?
Lots of the WH staffers during Clinton's time couldn't pass an FBI check and refused to be drug tested.
But now, of course, the Democrats are in high drungeon about national security. RIiiiight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.