Skip to comments.
3-Billion Year Old Manufactured Spheroids? Even NASA is baffled)
Private Web Site ^
Posted on 03/04/2005 6:47:53 PM PST by The Loan Arranger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-223 next last
Strange. If this is true, humans, or someone intelligent, have been around a lot longer than we've been led to believe.
To: The Loan Arranger
NO!!! Don't do it!!! They're the baby Hortas!!!!!
Mark
Dammit Jim, I'm a doctor, not a brickmason!
2
posted on
03/04/2005 6:49:49 PM PST
by
MarkL
(That which does not kill me, has made the last mistake it will ever make!)
To: The Loan Arranger
Considering there's almost no documentation of any of the claims on the website, it's probably a load of BS from a kook.
To: The Loan Arranger
Birdshot for Pterodactyl?
4
posted on
03/04/2005 6:50:36 PM PST
by
Semper911
(Those who wait also serve.)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: The Loan Arranger
6
posted on
03/04/2005 6:52:19 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: The Loan Arranger
Visitors
7
posted on
03/04/2005 6:52:45 PM PST
by
Andy from Beaverton
(I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
To: Strategerist
it's probably a load of BS from a kook.probably?
8
posted on
03/04/2005 6:54:06 PM PST
by
Apollo
To: The Loan Arranger
BS until a legitimate source says something.
9
posted on
03/04/2005 6:54:24 PM PST
by
Crazieman
(Islam. Religion of peace, and they'll kill you to prove it.)
To: The Loan Arranger
Bt..But....evolution is science.....
Noooooooo!
NeverGore :^)
10
posted on
03/04/2005 6:55:38 PM PST
by
nevergore
(“It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.”)
To: The Loan Arranger
How do we know that NASA is "baffled"? The website contains no references...this has hoax written all over it.
11
posted on
03/04/2005 6:55:49 PM PST
by
Herk
To: The Loan Arranger
What is the evidence that they were manufactured?
12
posted on
03/04/2005 6:57:01 PM PST
by
c-five
To: dcuddeback
Perhaps the accepted methods of dating artifacts are inaccurate? This is the accepted artifact to compare against.
13
posted on
03/04/2005 6:57:02 PM PST
by
SirChas
To: Crazieman
Yeah. Those Dan Rather documents are real until a "legitimate source" says otherwise, too.
To: MarkL
15
posted on
03/04/2005 6:57:22 PM PST
by
Sloth
(I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
To: The Loan Arranger
Strange. If anyone thinks this is true, buy tinfoil futures.
16
posted on
03/04/2005 6:57:24 PM PST
by
JasonC
To: Semper911
Prehistoric pterodactyl poachers, no doubt!
"I saw it on the internet, so it MUST be true!"
To: SirChas
To: The Loan Arranger
I've read alot about unusual and unexplainable archeology.
While I don't deny it exists, there are other problems.
Where are the mines? Where are the roads?
500,000 years from now, even if man is wiped out in the next 20 years, the evidence of man having been here will still be unmistakable and irrefutable.
So while things like this are anomalies, and certainly raise way more questions than they answer, show me some infrastructure!!
19
posted on
03/04/2005 6:59:59 PM PST
by
djf
To: antienvironmentalist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-223 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson